Linguistic Risk-Taking: A New Pedagogical Approach and a Research Program

Resumen

Linguistic risks are situations in which learners are pushed out of their comfort zone to use the target language in meaningful and authentic settings. This article outlines a novel pedagogical and research approach to language learning through linguistic risk-taking. I review the construct of linguistic risk from interdisciplinary perspectives and describe the context, rationale, and development of an innovative initiative for supporting French and English language learning at the University of Ottawa, the largest bilingual (English-French) university in the world. Data from 554 participants collected through a Linguistic Risk-Taking Passport, a tool allowing learners to self-report risk-taking patterns, propose additional risks, and add qualitative comments are analyzed to validate the approach. Avenues for transformation of the tool into a digital app and its relevance to other contexts and other languages are also discussed.

Citas

1. Albero, B., & Poteaux, N. (2014). Enjeux et dilemmes de l’autonomie : une expérience d’autoformation à l’université : étude de cas (T. 3). Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
2. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6p1), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445
3. Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York University Press.
4. Beebe, L. M. (1983). Risk-taking and the language learner. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 39–66). Newbury House.
5. Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958
6. Benson, P. (2011). What’s new in autonomy? The Language Teacher, 35(4), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTTLT35.4-4
7. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. SAGE Publications.
8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-000
10. Cajka, S, Griffiths, E., Slavkov, N. & Vetter, E. (2023). Linguistic risk-taking and informal language learning: From Canada to Austria. In D. Toffoli, G. Sockett & M. Kusyk (Eds.), Language learning and leisure: Informal second language learning in the 21st century. De Gruyter Mouton.
11. Cervantes, I. M. (2014). The role of risk-taking behavior in the development of speaking skills in ESL classrooms. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 19, 421–435. Retrieved [September 15, 2019] from https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rlm/article/view/13952
12. Collentine, J., & Freed, B.F. (2004). Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263104262015
13. Cook, V. J. (1991). The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multicompetence. Second Language Research, 7(2), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839100700203
14. Cook, V. J. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185-209. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587717
15. Cook, V. J. (2013). Multi-competence. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3768–3774). Wiley-Blackwell.
16. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. https://rm.coe.int/16802fc1bf
17. Council of Europe. (2018, February). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989
18. Cummins, J. (2008). Teaching for transfer: Challenging the two solitudes assumption in bilingual education. In: N.H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_116
19. Dehbozorgi, E. (2012). Effects of attitude towards language learning and risk-taking on EFL student’s proficiency. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(2), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n2p41
20. Dewaele, J.-M. (2012). Risk-taking and foreign language learning. In M. Byram & A. Hu (Eds.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning (2nd ed., pp. 598–600). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203101513
21. Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237–274. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.5
22. Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety. The right and left feet of FL learning. In P. D. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen and S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA. (pp. 215-236). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095360-010
23. Dewaele, J.-M., Witney, J., Saito, K., & Dewaele, L. (2018). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 676–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817692161
24. Ellis, R. (2009). Task‐based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
25. Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108643689
26. Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second Language Acquisition: An introductory course. (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932841
27. Germain-Rutherford, A. (2021). Action-oriented approaches: Being at the heart of the action. In T. Beaven & F. Rosell-Aguilar (Eds.), Innovative language pedagogy report (pp. 91-96). https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.50.1241
28. Gilbert, L. S., Jackson, K., & di Gregorio, S. (2014). Tools for analyzing qualitative data: The history and relevance of qualitative data analysis software. In J. M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 221–236). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_18
29. Gremmo, M.-J., & Riley, P. (1995). Autonomy, self-direction and self-access in language teaching and learning: The history of an idea. System, 23(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00002-2
30. Griffiths, E. & Slavkov, N. (2021) Linguistic risk-taking: A bridge between classroom and outside world. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24, 2, 127-158. https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2021.31308
31. Griffiths, E. (2019). L’autonomie ne se fait pas toute seule : linguistic risk-taking as a vehicle for communication strategy instruction. (Unpublished major research paper). University of Ottawa, Ottawa.
32. Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and language, 36(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90048-5
33. Holden, C.L., & Sykes, J.M. (2011). Leveraging mobile games for place-based language learning. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 1(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.2011040101
34. Kapp, K. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer
35. Karimi, M., & Biria, R. (2017). Impact of risk-taking strategies on male and female EFL learners’ test performance: The case of multiple-choice questions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(10), 892–899. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0710.10
36. Lantolf, J.P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
37. Lazaraton, A. (2014). Second language speaking. In M. Celce-Murcia, D.M. Brinton, & M.A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed., pp. 106–120). National Geographic Learning.
38. Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Authentik.
39. Little, D. (1999). Strategies, counselling and cultural difference: Why we need an anthropological understanding of learner autonomy. Bells: Barcelona English literature and language studies, 10, 17–33. https://raco.cat/index.php/Bells/article/view/102823.
40. Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing Second Language Acquisition (Vol. 18, pp. 77–99). Multilingual Matters.
41. Macintyre, P.D., & Mercer, S. (2015). Introducing positive psychology to SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 4(2), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.2
42. Macintyre, P. D., & Gregersen, T. (2012a). Affect: The role of language anxiety and other emotions in language learning. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Language learning psychology (pp. 103-118). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032829_8
43. Macintyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.x
44. Macintyre, P. D. (2021). Exploring applications of positive psychology in SLA. In K. Budzińska & O. Majchrzak (Eds.), Positive psychology in second and foreign language education (pp. 3–17). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64444-4_1
45. Macintyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq037
46. Macintyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in an L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
47. Macintyre, P.D., & Gregersen, T. (2012b). Emotions that facilitate language learning: The positive broadening power of the imagination. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 193-213. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.2.4
48. MacLennan, H. (2018). Two solitudes. M. Gnarowski. (Ed.). Macmillan of Canada.(Original work published 1945). https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773553897
49. McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin Press.
50. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667336
51. Prensky M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
52. Rhéaume, M., Slavkov, N. & Séror, J. (2021) Linguistic risk-taking in second language learning: The case of French at a Canadian Bilingual Institution. Foreign Language Annals, 54(4), 1214-1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12561
53. Roberts, C., & Cooke, M. (2009). Authenticity in the adult ESOL classroom and beyond. TESOL Quarterly, 43(4), 620–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00189.x
54. Roodi, F. & Slavkov, N. (2022). Gamification in L2 teaching and learning: Linguistic risk-taking at play. OLBI Journal, 12(1), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.18192/olbij.v12i1.6000
55. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
56. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2007). Tasks in Second Language Learning. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596429
57. Séror, J., & Slavkov, N. (2019) Soutenir la prise de risques linguistiques chez l’apprenant langagier. Soutenir la prise de risques linguistiques chez l’apprenant langagier. Journal de l’immersion, 41(1), 9-13.
58. Slavkov, N. & Griffiths, E. (in preparation). The development of a mobile application to promote linguistic risk-taking. The development of the linguistic risk-taking initiative at the University of Ottawa. Canadian Modern Language Review, 75(3), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2018-0202
59. Slavkov, N. (2016). In search of the right questions: Language background profiling at Ontario public schools. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 22–45. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/22320
60. Slavkov, N. (2018) What is your ‘first’ language in bilingual Canada? A study of language background profiling at publicly-funded elementary schools across three provinces, International Journal of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education, 21(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1126217
61. Slavkov, N. (2020) Where the magic happens: Fostering language learning, bilingualism and multilingualism through linguistic risk-taking. In T. Tinnefeld (Ed.), The magic of language: Productivity in linguistics and language teaching (pp. 47-69). Saarland University of Applied Sciences Press.
62. Slavkov, N., Melo-Pfeifer, S., & Kerschhofer-Puhalo, N. (2022). The changing face of the “native speaker”: Perspectives from multilingualism and globalization. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501512353
63. Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.