Aller directement au menu principal Aller directement au contenu principal Aller au pied de page
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Articles

Vol. 26 No. 1 (2023)

Who Is Immersion for?: A Critical Analysis of French Immersion Policies

DOI
https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2023.32817
Soumise
mars 23, 2022
Publié-e
2023-03-15

Résumé

L’élitisme est un concerne dans le programme canadien de l’immersion française depuis son lancement. Cette étude examine comment deux conseils scolaires ontariens et multiraciaux et les politiques, le programme d’études, et d’autres documents ontariens d’immersion française construisent et soutiennent un élève d’élite dans le programme d’immersion. L’élève d’élite qui émerge des documents est blanc, d’une classe moyenne, anglophone et un résident établi, ce qui reflète les données démographiques actuelles du programme. Un biais envers la classe moyenne s’est émergé dans les documents à cause d’une richesse présupposée et un manque d’assistance financier, du transport et de matériaux promotionnels. Les programmes se trouvent dans les quartiers de classe moyenne. Le programme d’études démontre un focus eurocentriste et colonial. Dans les documents de cette étude, on suppose que les parents ont une connaissance fonctionnelle de l’anglais et du français. Les points d’entrée du programme donnent préférence aux résidents établis au lieu des immigrés récents. En vue de son élitisme évident, on voit un changement vers l’inclusion, surtout pour les élèves avec des besoins spéciaux et les apprenants de l’anglais langue seconde. Cependant, cette inclusion n’est pas encore mise en pratique de façon critique.

Références

  1. Ahmed, S. (2006). The nonperformativity of antiracism. Meridians, 7(1), 104-126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2979/MER.2006.7.1.104
  2. Andera, S. (2007). Graphic novels in the school library to help promote literacy for boys. PNLA Quarterly, 71(4), 5-8.
  3. Apple, M. W. (1999). The absent presence of race in educational reform. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 2(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332990020102
  4. Arnett, K. (2013). The genesis and perpetuation of exemptions and transfers from French second language programs for students with diverse learning needs: A preliminary examination and their link to inclusion. In C. Mady (Ed.), Minority populations in Canadian second language education (pp. 103-117). Multilingual Matters.
  5. Arnett, K., & Mady, C. (2010). A critically conscious examination of special education within FSL and its relevance to FSL teacher education programs. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 19-36.
  6. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). La réproduction : elements pour une théorie du système d'enseignement. Minuit.
  7. Bower, H. & Griffin, D. (2011). Can the Epstein model of parental involvement work in a high-minority, high-poverty elementary school? A case study. Professional School Counseling, 15(2), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.5330/PSC.n.2011-15.77
  8. Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse, 32(4), 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601555
  9. Brown, R. & Bennett, K. (2017, November). Elementary French Immersion Program Review. Mississauga, ON: Peel District School Board.
  10. Bruck, M. (1978). The suitability of early French immersion programs for the language disabled child. Canadian Modern Language Review, 34(5), 884-887. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.34.5.884
  11. Cherng, H.-Y. S., & Halpin, P. F. (2016). The importance of minority teachers: Student perceptions of minority versus white teachers. Educational Researcher, 45(7), 407-420. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16671718
  12. Cobb, C. (2015). Is French immersion a special education loophole? ... And does it intensify issues of accessibility and exclusion? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(2), 170-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.887052
  13. Côté, I. (2021). L’inclusion des perspectives autochtones dans le programme d’immersion française en Colombie-Britannique : les succès d’enseignants et d’enseignantes allochtones. Éducation et francophonie, 49(1), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.7202/1076999ar
  14. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
  15. Crépeau, N., & Fleuret, C. (2018). L’enseignement du français chez les Premières Nations d’hier à aujourd’hui : défis didactiques, pratiques pédagogiques et compétence plurilingue. Journal of Belonging, Identity, Language, and Diversity (J-BILD)/Revue de Langage, d’identité, de diversité et d’appartenance (R-LIDA), 2(1), 101-122.
  16. Collins, D. & Coleman, T. (2008). Social geographies of education: Looking within, and beyond, school boundaries. Geography Compass, 2(1), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00081.x
  17. Cummins, J. (2014). Rethinking assumptions in Canadian French immersion programs. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 2(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.2.1.01cum
  18. Dagenais, D. (2003). Accessing imagined communities through multilingualism and immersion education. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2(4), 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0204_3
  19. Dagenais, D., & Berron, C. (2001). Promoting multilingualism through French immersion and language maintenance in three immigrant families. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 14(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310108666618
  20. Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
  21. Davis, S., Ballinger, S., & Sarkar, M. (2019). The suitability of French immersion for allophone students in Saskatchewan: Exploring diverse perspectives on language learning and inclusion.
  22. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 27-63. https://doi.org/10.7202/1063773ar
  23. Dei, G. J. S. (2000). Towards an anti-racism discursive framework. In A. M. Calliste & G. J. S. Dei (Eds.), Power, knowledge and anti-racism education a critical reader (pp. 23-39). Fernwood.
  24. Dei, G. J. S. (2006, September 28). Meeting equity fair and square [Keynote address]. Leadership Conference of the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario, Mississauga, Ontario. Dei, G. J. S. (2013). CHAPTER ONE: Reframing critical anti-racist theory (CART) for contemporary times. Counterpoints, 445, 1-14.
  25. Dei, G. J. S. (2016). Decolonizing the university: The challenges and possibilities of inclusive education. Socialist Studies, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.18740/S4WW31
  26. Duchêne, A. (2016). Investissement langagier et économie politique. Langage et sociéte, 157(3), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.157.0073
  27. Duchêne, A., & Heller, M. (2012). Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit. Routledge.
  28. Durham District School Board. (2021). French as a Second Language Programming in the Durham District School Board Draft Report. Durham District School Board.
  29. Fontaine, L. S. (2017). Redress for linguicide: Residential schools and assimilation in Canada. British Journal of Canadian Studies, 30(2), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.3828/bjcs.2017.11
  30. Genesee, F. (2007). French immersion and at-risk students: A review of research evidence. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(5), 655-726. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.5.655
  31. Gorski, P. C. (2012). Perceiving the problem of poverty and schooling: Deconstructing the class stereotypes that mis-shape education practice and policy. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(2), 302-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2012.666934
  32. Gossling, D. (2006). Report on the Review of French Immersion and Extended French Programs. The Toronto District School Board.
  33. Hakeem, H. (2022). Queering the French language classroom: A social justice approach to discussing gender, privilege, and oppression. In Diversity and decolonization in French studies (pp. 183-196). Springer.
  34. Heller, M. (1990). French immersion in Canada: a model for Switzerland? Multilingua, 9(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1990.9.1.67
  35. Heller, M. (2002). Éléments d'une sociolinguistique critique. Didier.
  36. Heller, M., Pietikäinen, S., & Pujolar, J. (2018). Critical sociolinguistic research methods: studying language issues that matter. Routledge.
  37. Herring, C., & Henderson, L. (2016). Wealth inequality in black and white: Cultural and structural sources of the racial wealth gap. Race and Social problems, 8(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-016-9159-8
  38. Hoffman, J. (2017, December). A changing profession. Professionally speaking. https://professionallyspeaking.oct.ca/2017-12/2017-12-Feature-Story-3-PS.asp
  39. Horvat, E.M., Weininger, E. B., & Lareau, A. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319–351. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040002319
  40. James, C.E. & Turner, T. (2017). Towards race equity in education: The schooling of black students in the Greater Toronto Area. York University. https://youthrex.com/report/towards-race-equity-in-education-the-schooling-of-black-students-in-the-greater-toronto-area/
  41. Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985376
  42. Kasuya, K. (2001). Discourses of linguistic dominance: A historical consideration of French language ideology. International Review of Education, 47(3/4), 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017993507936
  43. Kissau, S. (2007). Is what's good for the goose good for the gander? The case of male and female encouragement to study French. Foreign Language Annals, 40(3), 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02867.x
  44. Knouzi, I., & Mady, C. (2017). Indicators of an “immigrant advantage” in the writing of L3 French learners. Canadian Modern Language Review, 73(3), 368-392. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.3818
  45. Kunnas, R.M. (2019). Inequities in Black et Blanc: Textual constructions of the French immersion student. (Publication No. 13905011) [Master’s thesis, University of Toronto]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  46. Lavoie, C. (2015). Trois stratégies efficaces pour enseigner le vocabulaire : une expérience en contexte scolaire innu. Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 18(1), 1-20.
  47. Lazaruk, W. A. (2007). Linguistic, academic, and cognitive benefits of French immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(5), 605-627. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.5.605
  48. Lejano, R. P. (2006). Frameworks for policy analysis: merging text and context. Routledge.
  49. Luet, K. M. (2017). Disengaging Parents in Urban Schooling. Educational Policy, 31(5), 674–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815616481
  50. Mady, C. (2013). Moving towards inclusive French as a second official language education in Canada. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2011.580463
  51. Mady, C. (2015). Examining immigrants’ English and French proficiency in French immersion. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(2), 268-284. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.2.05mad
  52. Mady, C. (2016). French immersion for English language learners?: Kindergarten teachers’ perspectives. Alberta Journal of International Research, 63(2), 253-267.
  53. Mady, C. (2017). The bilingual advantage for immigrant students in French immersion in Canada: linking advantages to contextual variables. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(3), 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1041875
  54. Mady, C., & Arnett, K. (2009). Inclusion in French immersion in Canada: One parent’s perspective. Exceptionality Education International, 19(2), 37-49.
  55. Mady, C., & Arnett, K. (2015). French as a second language teacher candidates’ conceptions of allophone students and students with learning difficulties. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 78-95.
  56. Mady, C., & Masson, M. (2018). Principals’ beliefs about language learning and inclusion of English language learners in Canadian elementary French immersion programs. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.7202/1050811ar
  57. Mady, C. & Turnbull, M. (2009). Learning French as a second official language: Reserved for Anglophones? Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 99, 1-23.
  58. Makropoulos, J. (1998). Sociopolitical analysis of French immersion developments in Canada (Publication No. MQ40661) [Master’s thesis, University of Toronto]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  59. Makropoulos, J. (2009). Gaining access to late French-immersion programs: class-based perspectives of Canadian students in an Ottawa high school. Bilingual Research Journal, 32(3), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235880903378941
  60. Makropoulos, J. (2010). Students' attitudes to the secondary French immersion curriculum in a Canadian context. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 23(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310903494525
  61. Masson, M., Knouzi, I., Arnott, S., & Lapkin, S. (2021). A critical interpretive synthesis of post millennial Canadian French as a second language research across stakeholders and programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 77(2), 154-188. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr-2020-0025
  62. Moeller, R. (2011). “Aren't these boy books?”: High school students' readings of gender in graphic novels. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(7), 476-484.
  63. Moore, D. (2010). Multilingual literacies and third script acquisition: young Chinese children in French immersion in Vancouver, Canada. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(4), 322-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2010.502231
  64. Olson, P. (1983). Inequality remade: The theory of correspondence and the context of French immersion in Northern Ontario. Journal of Education, 165(1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748316500107
  65. Olson, P., & Burns, G. E. (1983). Politics, class, and happenstance: French immersion in a Canadian context. Interchange, 14(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01805814
  66. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2013a). The Ontario curriculum. French as a second language: Core French, grades 4-8, extended French, grades 4-8, French immersion, grades 1-8 (Revis ed.). Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  67. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2013b). Framework for French as a second language in Ontario schools: Kindergarten to Grade 12. Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  68. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2014). The Ontario curriculum Grades 9 to 12: French as a second language: Core French, extended French, French immersion grades 1-8 (Revised ed.). Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  69. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2015). Including students with special education needs in French as a second language programs: A guide For Ontario schools. Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  70. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). Welcoming English language learners into French as a second language programs: A companion resource to a framework for FSL, K-12. Queen's Printer for Ontario.
  71. Parekh, G., Killoran, I., & Crawford, C. (2011). The Toronto connection: poverty, perceived ability, and access to education equity. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(3), 249-279.
  72. Prasad, G. (2012). Multiple minorities or culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) plurilingual learners?: Re-envisioning allophone immigrant children and their inclusion in French-language schools in Ontario. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(2), 190-215. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.68.2.190
  73. Picower, B. (2009). The unexamined whiteness of teaching: how white teachers maintain and enact dominant racial ideologies. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 12(2), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320902995475
  74. Potvin, M., & Carr, P. (2008). La « valeur ajoutée » de l’éducation antiraciste : conceptualisation et mise en oeuvre au Québec et en Ontario. Éducation et francophonie, 36(1), 197-216.
  75. Roy, S. (2015). Discours et idéologies en immersion française. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 125-143.
  76. Roy, S. (2020). French immersion ideologies in Canada. Lexington Books.
  77. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
  78. Simpson, J. S. (2003). We are not enough: Epistemology and the production of knowledge. In J.S. Simpson (Ed.), “I have been waiting”: Race and U.S. higher education (pp. 63-116). University of Toronto Press.
  79. Sinay, E. (2010). Programs of choice in the TDSB: characteristics of students in French immersion, alternative schools, and other specialized schools and programs. Toronto District School Board.
  80. Sinay, E., Presley, A., Armson, S., Tam, G., Ryan, T., Burchell, D., & Barron, C. (2018). Toronto District School Board French as a Second Language Program Review: Developmental Evaluation (Research Report No. 18/19-03).
  81. Spiegelman, J. D. (2022). “You used ‘elle,’ so now you’re a girl”: Discursive possibilities for a non-binary teenager in French class. L2 Journal, 14(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.5070/L214351439
  82. Tashakkori, A., Johnson, R. B., & Teddlie, C. (2020). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  83. Traub, A., Sullivan, L., Maschede, T., & Shapiro, T. (2017). The asset values of whiteness: Understanding the racial wealth gap. Policy file. Demos.
  84. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to Action. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada
  85. Upper Grand District School Board. (2016). Report of the French Review Committee 2015. Upper Grand District School Board.
  86. Upper Grand District School Board. (2017). Report of the Secondary FSL Review Committee - 2016/2017. Presented to the Board of Trustees. Upper Grand District School Board.
  87. Wise, N. (2011). Access to special education for exceptional students in French immersion programs: An equity issue. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 177-193.
  88. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  89. Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. SAGE.
  90. Yoon, E.-S., & Gulson, K. N. (2010). School choice in the stratilingual city of Vancouver. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(6), 703-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2010.528871