Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Articles

Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2022)

Investigating the Lexical Demands of English-as-an-Additional-Language and General-Audience Podcasts and Their Potential for Incidental Vocabulary Learning

DOI
https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2022.32746
Enviado
enero 31, 2022
Publicado
2022-10-20

Resumen

This study investigated the lexical demands of English-as-an-additional-language (EAL) and general-audience podcasts and their potential for incidental vocabulary learning. Two corpora (i.e., one EAL and one general-audience) comprising 1,188,512 tokens were analyzed to determine the necessary vocabulary knowledge to reach 90% and 95% coverage. The results indicated that 2,000 and 3,000 word families plus proper nouns (PN), marginal words (MW), transparent compounds (TC), and acronyms (AC) covered 90% and 95% of words in podcasts, respectively. The results also showed that EAL and general-audience podcasts required 1,000 and 2,000 words families to reach 90% coverage, respectively. Regarding 95% coverage, knowledge of 2,000 (EAL) and 3,000 (general-audience) word families was required. The results also demonstrated almost 60% of word families from the 2,000-word level were encountered 15+ times in each corpus, suggesting podcasts may hold relatively great potential for learning such words incidentally. Furthermore, our findings indicated that there was some potential for incidentally learning words from the 3,000-word level in both corpora, while general-audience podcasts may hold greater potential in this regard. Implications for using podcasts in language pedagogy are also discussed.

Citas

  1. Alm, A. (2013). Extensive listening 2.0 with foreign language podcasts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2013.836207
  2. Anthony, L. (2021). AntWordProfiler (Version 1.5.1) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
  3. Bauer, L., & Nation, I. S. P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6(4), 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/6.4.253
  4. Bonk, W. J. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2000.10499033
  5. Brown, D., Stewart, J., Stoeckel, T., & Mclean, S. (2021). The coming paradigm shift in the use of lexical units. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43, 950–953. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000668
  6. Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 136–163. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ815119.pdf
  7. Cervetti, G., & Wright, T. (2020). The Role of Knowledge in Understanding and Learning From Text. In E. Birr Moje, P. Afflerbach, P. Enciso, & N. Lesaux (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 237–260). Routledge.
  8. Chang, A., & Millett, S. (2013). The effect of extensive listening on developing L2 listening fluency: some hard evidence. ELT Journal, 68(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct052
  9. Chen, C., & Truscott, J. (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 693–713. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq031
  10. Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2014). The lexical profile of academic spoken English. English for Specific Purposes, 33(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.08.001
  11. Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2016). Evaluating lists of high-frequency words. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167(2), 132–158. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.167.2.02dan
  12. Dang, T. N. Y., Webb, S., & Coxhead, A. (2020). Evaluating lists of high-frequency words: Teachers’ and learners’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 26(4), 617−641. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820911189
  13. Douglas, S. R. (2013). The lexical breadth of undergraduate novice level writing competency. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 152–170. http://journals.hil.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/21176
  14. Douglas, S. R. (2016). The relationship between lexical frequency profiling measures and rater judgements of spoken and written general English language proficiency on the CELPIP-General Test. TESL Canada Journal, 32, 43–64. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v32i0.1217
  15. Durbahn, M., Rodgers, M., & Peters, E. (2020). The relationship between vocabulary and viewing comprehension. System, 88, 102–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102166
  16. Feng, Y., & Webb, S. (2019). Learning vocabulary through reading, listening, and viewing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(3), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263119000494
  17. Freimuth, H. (2020). Are academic English words learned incidentally? A Canadian case study. BC TEAL Journal, 5(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.14288/bctj.v5i1.344
  18. Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.11.001
  19. Heilesen, S. (2010). What is the academic efficacy of podcasting? Computers & Education, 55(3), 1063–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.002
  20. Horst, M. (2010). How well does teacher talk support incidental vocabulary acquisition? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 161–180. https://doi.org/10125/66646
  21. Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/66973/13_1_10125_66973
  22. _rfl131hsuehchao.pdf
  23. Jin, Z., & Webb, S. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning through listening to teacher talk. The Modern Language Journal, 104(3), 550–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12661
  24. Kaneko, M. (2015). Vocabulary size required for the TOEFL iBT Listening Section. The Language Teacher, 39(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTTLT39.1-2
  25. Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Lauren & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines (pp. 316–323). Multilingual Matters
  26. Laufer, B. (2021). LEMMAS, FLEMMAS, WORD FAMILIES, AND COMMON SENSE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 965–968. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000656
  27. Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.1
  28. Laufer, B., & Sim, D. (1985). An attempt to measure the threshold of competence for reading comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 18(5), 405–411.
  29. Lu, J. (2007). Podcasting: A fresh solution for old problems. Wireless Ready Symposium E-Proceedings. [Online]. pp. 83–95. http://opinion.nucba.ac.jp/~thomas/AngLu.pdf
  30. Macmillan. (n.d.). Podcast. In Macmillan Dictionary. Retrieved February 17, 2021, from https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/podcast
  31. Matthews, J. (2018). Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and midfrequency vocabulary knowledge. System, 72, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.10.005
  32. McBride, K. (2009). Podcasts and second language learning: Promoting listening comprehension and intercultural competence. In L. Abraham & L. Williams (Eds.), Electronic Discourse in Language Learning and Language Teaching (pp. 153–168). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.25.12mcb
  33. McLean, S. (2017). Evidence for the adoption of the flemma as an appropriate word counting unit. Applied Linguistics, 39(6), 823–845. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw050
  34. Meier, A. (2015). L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition through extensive listening to podcasts. Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 15, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8KP9D2G
  35. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). How many high frequency words are there in English? Language, Learning and Literature: Studies Presented to Hakan Ringbom. Abo Akademi University, Abo: English Department Publications, 4, 167–181.
  36. Nation, I. S. P. (2004). A study of the most frequent word families in the British National Corpus. In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer, Vocabulary in a Second Language (pp. 3–13). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.10.03nat
  37. Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
  38. Nation, I. S. P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation
  39. Nation, I. S. P. (2016). Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing. John Benjamins.
  40. Nation, I. S. P. (2017). The BNC/COCA level 6 word family lists (Version 1.0.0) [Data file]. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation.aspx
  41. Nguyen, C. D. (2020). Lexical features of reading passages in English-language textbooks for Vietnamese high-school students: Do they foster both content and vocabulary gain? RELC Journal, 52(3), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219895045
  42. Nurmukhamedov, U. (2017). Lexical coverage of TED Talks: Implications for vocabulary instruction. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 768–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.323
  43. Nurmukhamedov, U. & Sadler, R. (2011). Podcasts in four categories: Applications to language learning. In M. Abdous & B. Bacer (Eds.), Academic Podcasting and Mobile Assisted Language Learning: Applications and Outcomes (pp. 176–195). IGI Global. https://10.4018/978-1-60960-141-6.ch011
  44. Nurmukhamedov, U., & Sharakhimov, S. (2021). Corpus-based vocabulary analysis of English podcasts. RELC Journal, Online Advance Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220979315
  45. Pavia, N., Webb, S., & Faez, F. (2019). Incidental vocabulary learning through listening to songs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263119000020
  46. Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do things fall apart? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 31–55.
  47. Peters, E., & Webb, S. (2018). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through watching a single episode of L2 television. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 1−27.
  48. Phung, D. H., & Ha, H. T. (2022). Vocabulary demands of the IELTS listening test: An in-depth analysis. SAGE Open, 12, 1−13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079934
  49. Pulido, D. (2004). The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: A matter of topic familiarity? Language Learning, 54(3), 469–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00263.x
  50. Putman, S., & Kingsley, T. (2009). The atoms family: Using podcasts to enhance the development of science vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 63(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.63.2.1
  51. Qian, D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193
  52. Rodgers, M. P. H. & Heidt, J. (2020). Levelling up comprehensible input and vocabulary learning: The lexical profile of video games. In Werner, V. & Tegge, F. (Eds.), Pop culture in language education. Routledge.
  53. Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S. (2011). Narrow viewing: The vocabulary in related television programs. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 689–717. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.268062
  54. Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S. (2016). Listening to lectures. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 165–176). Routledge.
  55. Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning through viewing television. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 171(2), 191−220. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.18034.rod
  56. Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47(4), 484–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444812000018
  57. Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x
  58. Snoder, P., & Laufer, B. (2022). EFL Learners' Receptive Knowledge of Derived Words: The Case of Swedish Adolescents. TESOL Quarterly, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3101
  59. Tegge, F. (2017). The lexical coverage of popular songs in English language teaching. System, 67, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.04.016
  60. Tegge, F. & Coxhead, A. (2021). Exploring the vocabulary of rap lyrics. In V. Werner & F. Tegge (Eds.), Pop culture in language education: Theory, research, practice (pp. 71–84). Routledge.
  61. van Zeeland, H. (2018). Vocabulary in listening. In W. Renandya & G. Hu (Eds.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–6). Wiley.
  62. van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013a). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach. System, 41(3), 609–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.012
  63. van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013b). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams074
  64. Vidal, K. (2011). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61(1), 219–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00593.x
  65. Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L. & Schmitt, N. (2020). Frequency as a guide for vocabulary usefulness: High-, mid-, and low-frequency words. In S. Webb (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (pp. 81–95). Routledge.
  66. Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml048
  67. Webb, S. (2010). A corpus-driven study of the potential for vocabulary learning through watching movies. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.03web
  68. Webb, S. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning. In S. Webb (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (pp.225–239). Routledge.
  69. Webb, S. (2021). Research investigating lexical coverage and lexical profiling: What we know, what we don’t know, and what needs to be examined. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33(2), 287–302.
  70. Webb, S., & Macalister, J. (2013). Is text written for children useful for L2 extensive reading? TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 300−322. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70
  71. Webb, S., & Nation, I.S.P. (2017). How Vocabulary is Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  72. Webb, S., & Paribakht, T. (2015). What is the relationship between the lexical profile of test items and performance on a standardized English proficiency test? English for Specific Purposes, 38, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.11.001
  73. Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009a). The Lexical coverage of movies. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp010
  74. Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009b). Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59(2), 335–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00509.x
  75. Winn, R. (2021). 2021 Podcast Stats & Facts (New Research from Apr 2021). https://www.podcastinsights.com/podcast-statistics/
  76. Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic Language and Second Language Speech Fluency: Background, Evidence and Classroom Applications. Continuum.
  77. Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford University Press.
  78. Yeh, C. (2014). An investigation of a podcast learning project for extensive listening. Language Education in Asia, 4(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.5746/leia/13/v4/i2/a04/yeh
  79. Zahar, R., Cobb, T., & Spada, N. (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(4), 541–572. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.4.541