Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Articles

Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2023)

Aspects of EFL University Learners’ Lexical and Phraseological Proficiency as Predictors of Writing Quality

DOI
https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2023.32726
Enviado
enero 18, 2022
Publicado
2023-03-15

Resumen

This study aims to examine the relationship between the productive knowledge of some lexical and phraseological indices and the quality of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ writing. A sample of 120 expository essays, written by semesters 1 and 5 university students in a less proficient EFL context, are rated by human evaluators and automatically examined for the target indices. The results show that, unlike the index of lexical diversity, both indices of content word frequency and range could significantly discriminate between different proficiency levels. For the phraseological indices, both the proportions of rare and frequent bigrams yielded between-group differences, with higher proficiency students performing significantly better in both categories. Using a regression analysis, the results show that the use of rare and contextually restricted content words and the production of larger proportions of rare and frequent bigrams could be considered indicators of better writing proficiency. The study suggests implications for the teaching of EFL.

Citas

  1. Bestgen, Y. (2016a). Using collocational features to improve automated scoring of EFL texts. Proceedings of the 12th workshop on multiword expressions, 84-90.
  2. Bestgen, Y. (2016b). Evaluation automatique de textes : Validation interne et externe d'indices phraséologiques pour l'évaluation automatique de textes rédigés en anglais langue étrangère. Traitement automatique des langues, 57(3), 91-115.
  3. Bestgen, Y. (2019). Évaluation de textes en anglais langue étrangère et séries phraséologiques : comparaison de deux procédures automatiques librement accessibles. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, XXIV, 81-94. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.241.0081
  4. Bestgen, Y., & Granger, S. (2014). Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.004
  5. Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
  6. Covington, M. A., & McFall, J. D. (2010). Cutting the Gordian Knot: The moving average type token ratio (MATTR). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17(2), 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296171003643098
  7. Cowie, A. P. (1994). Phraseology. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 3168-3171). Oxford University Press.
  8. Cowie, A. P. (Ed.). (1998). Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications. Oxford University Press.
  9. Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2018). Assessing writing with the tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES). Assessing Writing, 38, 46-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.06.004
  10. Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading. 35(2). 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01449.x
  11. Crossley, S. A., Cai, Z., & McNamara, D. (2012). Syntagmatic, paradigmatic, and automatic N-gram approaches to assessing essay quality. Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS-25 (pp. 214-219).
  12. Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. (2010). The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers. Language Learning, 60, 573-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00568.x
  13. Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & McNamara D. S. (2014). Assessing lexical proficiency using analytic ratings: A case for collocation accuracy. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), 570-590, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt056
  14. Crossley, S. A., Subtirelu, N., & Salsbury, T. (2013). Frequency effects or context effects in second language word learning: What predicts early lexical production? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(4), 727-755. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000375
  15. Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., Allen, L., Guo, L., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in automated writing evaluation. Journal of Writing Assessment, 7(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06n1v820
  16. Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.). (2007). Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511667268
  17. Durrant, P. (2014). Corpus frequency and second language learners’ knowledge of collocations: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(4), 443-477. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.4.01dur
  18. Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2009). To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 47,157-177. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.007
  19. Ellis, N. C. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024
  20. Ellis, N. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 297-339. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002140
  21. Evert, S. (2005). The statistics of word cooccurrences: Words pairs and collocations [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universität Stuttgart.
  22. Evert, S. (2009). Corpora and collocations. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 1211-1248). Mouton de Gruyter.
  23. Fergadiotis, G., Wright, H. H., & West, T. M. (2013). Measuring lexical diversity in narrative discourse of people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(2), S397-S408. 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0083)
  24. Fergadiotis, G., Wright, H. H., & Green, S. B. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of lexical diversity indices: Assessing length effects. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 58(3), 840-852. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0280
  25. Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-1955. In Studies in linguistic analysis (pp. 1-32). Blackwell.
  26. Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67, 155-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12225
  27. González, M. C. (2017). The contribution of lexical diversity to college-level writing. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 899-919. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.342
  28. Granger, S., & Bestgen, Y. (2014). The use of collocations by intermediate vs. advanced non-native writers: A bigram-based study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 52(3), 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2014-0011
  29. Granger, S. & Bestgen, Y. (2017). Using collgrams to assess L2 phraseological development: A replication study. In P. de Haan, S. van Vuuren & R. de Vries (Eds.), Language, learners and levels: Progression and variation. corpora and language in use Proceedings 3 (pp. 385-408). Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
  30. Gries, S. T. (2008). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13, 403-437. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri
  31. Gries, S. T. (2010). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: Further explorations. In Corpus-linguistic applications (pp. 197–212). Brill Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042028012_014
  32. Gries, S. T., & Ellis, N. (2015). Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65(1), 228-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12119
  33. Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing, 18(3), 218-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
  34. Halliday, M. A. K. (1966). Lexis as a linguistic level. In C. Bazell, J. Catford, M. A. K. Halliday, & R. Robins (Eds.), In memory of J. R. Firth (pp. 148-162). Longman.
  35. Howarth, P. A. (1996). Phraseology in English academic writing. Max Niemeyer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110937923
  36. Howarth, P. A. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.24
  37. Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203327630
  38. Jansen, T., Vögelin, C., Machts, N., Keller, S., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2021). Judgment accuracy in experienced versus student teachers: Assessing essays in English as a foreign language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103216
  39. Jarvis, S. (2013). Defining and measuring lexical diversity. In S. Jarvis & M. Daller (Eds.). Vocabulary knowledge: Human ratings and automated measures (pp. 13-44). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.47.03ch1
  40. Jarvis, S. (2017). Grounding lexical diversity in human judgments. Language Testing, 34(4), 537-553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217710632
  41. Jarvis, S. & Hashimoto, B. J., (2021). How operationalizations of word types affect measures of lexical diversity. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 7(1),163-194. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20004.jar
  42. Johnson, W. (1944). Studies in language behavior I: A program of research. Psychological Monographs, 56(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093508
  43. Jung, Y. J., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. (2019). Predicting second language writing proficiency in learner texts using computational tools. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.1.3.37
  44. Kim, M., Crossley, S.A. & Kyle, K. (2018). Lexical sophistication as a multidimensional phenomenon: Relations to second language lexical proficiency, development, and writing quality. The Modern Language Journal,102, 120-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12447
  45. Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2015). Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 757-786. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.194
  46. Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2016). The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003
  47. Kyle, K., Crossley, S., & Berger, C. (2018). The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): Version 2.0. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1030-1046. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0924-4
  48. Kyle, K., Crossley, S. A., & Jarvis, S. (2020). Assessing the validity of lexical diversity indices using direct judgements. Language Assessment Quarterly, 0(0), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2020.1844205
  49. Kyle, K., Allen, L., Guo, L., & McNamara, D. (2014). Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in automated writing evaluation. Journal of Writing Assessment, 7(1), 1-16.
  50. Laufer, B. (1994). The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time? RELC Journal, 25(2), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829402500202
  51. Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
  52. Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & Durán, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511804
  53. McCarthy, P. M. (2005). An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Memphis. https://www.proquest.com/docview/305349212
  54. McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2007). Vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Language Testing, 24(4), 459-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207080767
  55. McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, Vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
  56. McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27(1), 57-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547
  57. Mel'cuk, I. (1995). Phrasemes in language and phraseology in linguistics. In M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idiom: Structural and psychological perspectives (pp. 167-232). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315806501
  58. Mel'cuk, I. (1998). Collocations and lexical functions. In A.P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications (pp. 23-53). Clarendon Press.
  59. Monteiro, K. R., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2018). In search of new benchmarks: Using L2 lexical frequency and contextual diversity indices to assess second language writing. Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 280-300. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy056
  60. Paquot, M., & Granger, S. (2012). Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 130-149. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000098
  61. Qian, Y. (2019). Dynamism of collocation in L2 English writing: A bigram-based study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,0(0). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2019-0012
  62. Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942
  63. Römer, U. (2009). The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 140-162. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.06rom
  64. Salsbury, T., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Psycholinguistic word information in second language oral discourse. Second Language Research 27(3), 343-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765831039585
  65. Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977
  66. Sinclair, J. M. (1987). Collocation: A progress report. In R. Steele & T. Threadgold (Eds.), Language topics (pp. 319-331). Benjamins.
  67. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.
  68. Sinclair, J. (1996). The search for units of meaning. Textus, 9(1), 75-106.
  69. Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209-243. http://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
  70. Treffers-Daller, J. (2013). Measuring lexical diversity among L2 learners of French: an exploration of the validity of D, MTLD and HD-D as measures of language ability. S. Jarvis & M. Daller (Eds.). Vocabulary knowledge: Human ratings and automated measures (pp. 79-104). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.47.05ch3
  71. Vidal, K., & Jarvis, S. (2018). Effects of English-medium instruction on Spanish students’ proficiency and lexical diversity in English. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 568-587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818817945
  72. Wolk, K., Wolk, A. & Marasek, K. (2017). Unsupervised tool for quantification of progress in L2 English phraseological. Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, 383-388.
  73. Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principles and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 463-489. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.463
  74. Yoon, Hyung-Jo. (2018). The development of ESL writing quality and lexical proficiency: Suggestions for assessing writing achievement. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1536756
  75. Zenker, F., & Kyle, K. (2021). Investigating minimum text lengths for lexical diversity indices. Assessing Writing, 47, 100505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100505