Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 27 No. 2 (2024): Special Issue: Indigenous Language Revitalization and Applied Linguistics: Exploring Relationships

O’nónna: A Curriculum for Land-Based Language Learning

DOI
https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2024.34534
Submitted
January 28, 2025
Published
2024-09-15

Abstract

The Atlas of Kanyen’kehá:ka Space project (Kanyen’kehá:ka Nation, 2020; see www.mohawkatlas.org) launched in 2019 for the purposes of preserving Kanyen’kéha (Mohawk language) place names and related landscape terminology. Built using Nunaliit, a community mapping framework developed by Carleton University’s Geomatics and Cartographic Research Centre (GCRC), the Atlas is capable of pinning points onto a map and attaching media such as pronunciations, photos, videos and documents to that point. With funding for the Atlas through the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, the Atlas Research Team held workshops in Kanyen’kehá:ka communities to document their space with over 198 places and approximately 188 media files added from within the communities. However, we knew there was also potential to use the Atlas for language revitalization activities. With funding from the National Indian Brotherhood, we created a language learning curriculum integrating the Atlas and drone technology with land-based activities which was used during Land Back Summer Camp, held at the Native North American Travelling College in Akwesasne in July 2022. This paper discusses the components of the curriculum centred around the Atlas as task-based language learning. Because of the wide range of ages and language proficiency, the curriculum is a combination of different methods and strategies that are designed to reinforce each other. These included teaching the campers how to fly drones and integrate the footage into the Atlas of Kanyen’kehá:ka Space working with four L1 Kanyen’kéha speakers to describe the footage. The camp also included land-based activities as well as games and activities in Kanyen’kéha.

 

References

  1. Chiblow, S., & Meighan, P. J. (2022). Language is land, land is language: The importance of Indigenous languages. Human Geography, 15(2), 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786211022899
  2. Cenerini, C., Junker, M. O., & Rosen, N. (2017). Mapping dialectal variation using the Algonquian Linguistic Atlas. Language Documentation and Conservation, 11, 305–324. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24738
  3. Crampton, J. W. (2001). Maps as social constructions: Power, communication and visualization. Progress in Human Geography, 25(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201678580494
  4. Davies, A., & Elder, C. (Eds.) (2004). The handbook of applied linguistics. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000
  5. Delaronde, K. M. (Executive Producer). (2004 – Present). Tóta tánon Ohkwá:ri [TV series]. Kanien’kehá:ka Onkwawén:na Raotitióhkwa Language and Cultural Center.
  6. Ellis, R. (2017). Task-based language teaching. In S. Loewen, & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 108–125). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968
  7. First Nations Information Governance Centre. (2023). The First Nations principles of OCAP®. https://fnigc.ca/ocap-training
  8. Francis, A. T. (2019). Haudenosaunee forest stewardship. [Master’s Thesis, Cornell University]. https://doi.org/10.7298/m5hy-bf32
  9. Gawne, L., & Ring, H. (2016). Mapmaking for language documentation and description. Language Documentation & Conservation, 10, 188–242. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24692
  10. Geomatics and Cartographic Research Centre. (2018). Nunaliit Atlas Framework. http://nunaliit.org
  11. Gomashie, G. (2019). Kanien’keha/Mohawk Indigenous language revitalization efforts in Canada. McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill, 54(1), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.7202/1060864ar
  12. Hercus, L., Hodges, F., & Simpson, J. (2009). The land is a map: Placenames of indigenous origin in Australia. ANU Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt24hfdz
  13. Himmelmann, N. P. (1998). Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 36(1), 161–195. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161
  14. Hinton, L. (2001). The master-apprentice language learning program. In L. Hinton, & K. Hale (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 217-226). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004261723_018
  15. Hinton, L. (2011). Language revitalization and language pedagogy: New teaching and learning strategies. Language and Education, 25(4), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.577220
  16. Hinton, L., Florey, M., Gessner, S., & Manatowa-Bailey, J. (2018). The master-apprentice language learning program. In L. Hinton, L. Huss, & G. Roche (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language revitalization. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561271
  17. Holme, R. (2003). Carrying a baby in the back: Teaching with an awareness of the cultural construction of language. In M. Bryam, & P. Grundy (Eds.), Context and culture in language teaching and learning. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596728-003
  18. Ingram, R. (2020). Naming place in Kanyen’kéha: A study using the O’nonna three-sided model. [Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University]. https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/2020-13999
  19. Ingram, R. (2021). Indigenous place names as visualizations of Indigenous knowledge. In J. B. Hess (Ed.), Digital mapping and Indigenous America (pp. 182–192). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295546
  20. Kanyen’kehá:ka Nation (Creators, Knowledge Holders). (2020). Atlas of Kanyen’kehá:ka Space [Map].Geomatics and Cartographic Research Centre. https://mohawkatlas.org
  21. Kermoal, N. (2016). Métis women’s environmental knowledge and the recognition of Métis rights. In N. Kermoal, & I. Altamirano-Jiménez (Eds.), Living on the land: Indigenous women’s understanding of place. Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771990417.01
  22. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
  23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  24. McIvor, O. (2020). Indigenous language revitalization and applied linguistics: Parallel histories, shared futures? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190520000094
  25. Mohawk Council of Akwesasne. (2023, March 23). Kanien’keha Crash Course Challenge. Mohawk Council of Akwesasne. http://www.akwesasne.ca/kanienkeha-crash-course-challenge-tewatewennaweienst
  26. Penfield, S. D., & Tucker, B. V. (2011). From documenting to revitalizing an endangered language: Where do applied linguists fit? Language and Education, 25(4), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.577219
  27. Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.
  28. Richards, M., & Kanatawakhon-Maracle, D. (2002). An intensive Native language program for adults: The instructors’ perspective. McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill, 37(3), 371–386. https://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/8644
  29. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
  30. Savignon, S. J. (2002). Communicative language teaching: Linguistic theory and classroom practice. In S. J. Savignon (Ed.), Interpreting communicative language teaching: Contexts and concerns in teacher education (pp. 1–28). Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npsh9.4
  31. Shaul, D. L. (2014). Linguistic ideologies of Native American language revitalization: Doing the lost language Ghost Dance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05293-9
  32. Six Nations Polytechnic. (2022). Programs & Courses. Six Nations Polytechnic. https://www.snpolytechnic.com/programs-courses
  33. van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L. (2013). Sociocultural theory and second language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482933
  34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.
  35. White, L. (2009). Free to be Kanien'kehaka: A case study of educational self-determination at the Akwesasne Freedom School (No. 3354523) [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona] ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/free-be-i-kanienkehaka-case-study-educational/docview/304847743/se-2
  36. Widdowson, H. G. (1980) Applied linguistics: The pursuit of relevance. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), On the scope of applied linguistics. Newbury House.
  37. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Intrinsic Books.