De la restauration à la rétromania : Adorno, Reynolds et l’enjeu du passé dans l’évaluation du présent musical
Requires Subscription PDF (Français (Canada))

How to Cite

Trottier, D. . (2022). De la restauration à la rétromania : Adorno, Reynolds et l’enjeu du passé dans l’évaluation du présent musical. MUSICultures, 48, 115–141. Retrieved from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/MC/article/view/32770

Abstract

This article provides a comparison between the philosopher Theodor W. Adorno and the music critic Simon Reynolds by means of two essays: Philosophie de la nouvelle musique (1962 [1949]) and Rétromania. Comment la culture pop recycle son passé pour s’inventer un futur (2012 [2011]). From their positions as music critics and their work reviewing the music of their time, these two authors adopted a conception of the art form that shares many similarities with how we seek to understand music today. It is in this context that past knowledge serves as a benchmark against which we may judge the music of today through the concepts of restoration and retromania. These concepts bring a historicist interpretation of music into play that relies on the fetishism of the measures used by musicians, specifically the between-wars European avant-garde with Adorno and the 2000s Anglo-American pop and rock with Reynolds. In this way, and without forgetting that what separates these two men, when it comes to their philosophies and their aesthetic positions, is anchored in a modernist posture where notions of originality, progress, and rebellion dominate. That is why the study stops with the critique of the two men while, at the same time, deepens the theories at the heart of their essays and the scope of their concept where the idea of a “return to” occurs.

Requires Subscription PDF (Français (Canada))
  • The author retains copyright over the work.
  • The author grants the journal owner (The Canadian Society for Traditional Music / La Société canadienne pour les traditions musicales) an exclusive license to publish the work.
  • The author may post a pre-print or post-print version of the work (see definitions below) on a personal website for up to twelve months after the work is published in MUSICultures. After twelve months, the pre-print version must be replaced with the published version.
  • The author may deposit the published PDF of the work in a non-commercial online repository twelve months after the work is published in MUSICultures, or any time thereafter.
  • Any such deposit must include a link to the work on the MUSICultures website, e.g., https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/MC/article/view/19996

A pre-print is a work-in-progress—a contribution not yet accepted, or perhaps even submitted, to MUSICultures.

A post-print is the version of a contribution after peer review and acceptance by MUSICultures, with revisions completed.

The published version is the PDF file of a contribution as it appears in MUSICultures.

Please note that academia.edu and ResearchGate.com are both for-profit repositories; authors may not deposit the published PDF of the work in these repositories until after the journal’s embargo period.

For permission to reprint or translate material from MUSICultures, please contact Heather Sparling, General Editor of MUSICultures (heather_sparling@cbu.ca).