Vol. 48 No. 1 (2021)
GAC Medallist Series

Hutchison Medallist 1. Wave-Dominated to Tide-Dominated Coastal Systems: A Unifying Model for Tidal Shorefaces and Refinement of the Coastal- Environments Classification Scheme

Shahin E. Dashtgard
Applied Research in Ichnology and Sedimentology (ARISE) Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
Romain Vaucher
Applied Research in Ichnology and Sedimentology (ARISE) Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
Byongcheon Yang
Korea National Oil Corporation, 305 Jongga-ro, Jung-gu, Ulsan, 44538, South Korea
Robert W. Dalrymple
Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
Geoscience Canada V.48 No1 (2021)

Publié-e 2021-03-31

Mots-clés

  • clastic sedimentology,
  • coastal classification,
  • mixed process,
  • mixed wave-tide,
  • shallow marine,
  • tidal shorefaces
  • ...Plus
    Moins

Comment citer

Dashtgard, S. E., Vaucher, R., Yang, B., & Dalrymple, R. W. (2021). Hutchison Medallist 1. Wave-Dominated to Tide-Dominated Coastal Systems: A Unifying Model for Tidal Shorefaces and Refinement of the Coastal- Environments Classification Scheme. Geoscience Canada, 48(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.12789/geocanj.2021.48.171

Résumé

Les systèmes de dépôts côtiers sont normalement classés en fonction de l’apport relatif des processus liés à la houle, aux marées et aux rivières. Si les environnements dominés par la houle et les rivières sont bien caractérisés, les environnements le long du continuum houle-marée sont relativement mal compris, ce qui limite la fiabilité et l’utilité des systèmes de classification des côtes. Deux modèles d’avant-plages tidales, les estrans ouverts (open-coast tidal flats; OCTF) et les avant-plages modulées par la marée (tidally modulated shoreface; TMS), ont été introduits pour les milieux côtiers mixtes, houle-marée. Suite à près de deux décennies de recherche sur les avant-plages tidales, un certain nombre d’informations importantes ont été obtenues et ces données sont utilisées ici pour développer un modèle unifié pour ces systèmes. Tout d’abord, les OCTF sont les composants de systèmes de dépôt plus vastes et, dans de nombreux exemples publiés, les OCTF recouvrent des successions sédimentaires allant du large à l’avant-plage inférieure, similaires à celle des TMS. Par conséquent, nous combinons les OCTF et les TMS en un seul modèle d’avant-plage tidale où les TMS (tel que décrit à l’origine) et les successions TMS-OCTF sont considérés comme des variantes le long du continuum houle-marée. Deuxièmement, les successions d’avant-plages tidales sont préférentiellement préservées dans des environnements ayant une houle faible à modérée et dans des systèmes progradant et aggradant. Il est probablement difficile de distinguer les avant-plages tidales de leurs homologues dominés par les tempêtes. Troisièmement, les avant-plages tidales, incluant à la fois les TMS et les OCTF devraient présenter des dépôts de tempête modulés par la marée, reflétant ainsi la variation de l’énergie des vagues de tempête sur le fond marin liée à la marée montante et descendante. Les avant-plages tidales peuvent également présenter une interstratification de structures générées par la marée (par exemple, des doubles drapages argileux ou des rides de courants bidirectionnelles) déposées pendant des conditions de beau temps, et des dépôts de tempête (par exemple, des stratifications en mamelons) au niveau de l’avant-plage inférieure et éventuellement de l’avant-plage supérieure.
Le développement du modèle d’avant-plage tidale met en lumière les limites de la classification tripartite (houle-marée-rivière) des environnements côtiers actuellement acceptée et une classification révisée est présentée. En particulier, les OCTF et les estrans sont des composantes de systèmes de
dépôt plus importants et ne peuvent être identifiés que dans le registre sédimentaire dans les milieux où les dépôts intertidaux et supratidaux sont préservés; par conséquent, ils ne devraient pas représenter le membre extrême des systèmes côtiers dominé par la marée. Nous suggérons plutôt que les baies dominées par la marée occupent cette place. Les baies dominées par les marées présentent une influence limitée des vagues et des rivières et comprennent un large éventail de caractéristiques géomorphologiques généralement associées aux processus de marée, notamment des chenaux, des barres et des platiers tidaux.

Références

  1. Ainsworth, R.B., Vakarelov, B.K., and Nanson, R.A., 2011, Dynamic spatial and temporal prediction of changes in depositional processes on clastic shorelines: Towards improved subsurface uncertainty reduction and management: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 95, p. 267–297, https://doi.org/10.1306/06301010036.
  2. Ainsworth, R.B., Vakarelov, B.K., Lee, C., MacEachern, J.A., Montgomery, A.E., Ricci, L.P., and Dashtgard, S.E., 2015, Architecture and evolution of a regressive, tide-influenced marginal marine succession, Drumheller, Alberta, Canada: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 85, p. 596–625, https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2015.33.
  3. Angus, L., Hampson, G.J., Palci, F., and Fraser, A.J., 2020, Characteristics and context of high-energy, tidally modulated, barred shoreface deposits: Kimmeridgian-Tithonian sandstones, Weald Basin, southern U.K. and northern France: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 90, p. 313–335, https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2020.19.
  4. Bádenas, B., Aurell, M., and Gasca, J.M., 2018, Facies model of a mixed clastic-carbonate, wave-dominated open-coast tidal flat (Tithonian-Berriasian, northeast Spain): Sedimentology, v. 65, p. 1631–1666, https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12441.
  5. Basilici, G., De Luca, P.H.V., and Oliveira, E.P., 2012, A depositional model for a wave-dominated open-coast tidal flat, based on analyses of the Cambrian–Ordovician Lagarto and Palmares formations, northeastern Brazil: Sedimentology, v. 59, p. 1613–1639, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2011.01318.x.
  6. Billeaud, I., Caline, B., Livas, B., Tessier, B., Davaud, E., Frebourg, G., Hasler, C.-A., Laurier, D., and Pabian-Goyheneche, C., 2014, The carbonate-evaporite lagoon of Al Dakhirah (Qatar): an example of a modern depositional model controlled by longshore transport, in Martini, I.P., and Wanless, H.R., eds., Sedimentary Coastal Zones from High to Low Latitudes: Similarities and Differences: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 388, p. 561–587, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP388.7.
  7. Bluck, B.J., 1967, Sedimentation of beach gravels: Examples from south Wales: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 37, p. 128–156, https://doi.org/10.1306/74D71672-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D.
  8. Boyd, R., Dalrymple, R.W., and Zaitlin, B.A., 1992, Classification of clastic coastal depositional environments: Sedimentary Geology, v. 80, p. 139–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(92)90037-R.
  9. Clifton, H.E., 1969, Beach lamination: Nature and origin: Marine Geology, v. 7, p. 553–559, https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(69)90023-1.
  10. Clifton, H.E., 2006, A reexamination of facies models for clastic shorelines, in Posamentier, H.W., and Walker, R.G., eds., Facies Models Revisited: Society for Sedimentary Geology, Special Publication, v. 84, p. 293–337, https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.06.84.0293.
  11. Clifton, H.E., Hunter, R.E., and Phillips, R.L., 1971, Depositional structures and processes in the non-barred high-energy nearshore: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 41, p. 651–670, https://doi.org/10.1306/74D7231A-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D.
  12. Cummings, D.I., Dalrymple, R.W., Choi, K., and Jin, J.H., 2015, Chapter 4 - Geomorphology, in Cummings, D.I., Dalrymple, R.W., Choi, K., and Jin, J.H., eds., The Tide-Dominated Han River Delta, Korea: Geomorphology, Sedimentology, and Stratigraphic Architecture: Elsevier, p. 71–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800768-6.00004-3.
  13. Dalrymple, R.W., 1992, Tidal depositional systems, in Walker, R.G., and James, N.P., eds., Facies Models. Response to Sea Level Change: Geological Association of Canada, p. 195–218.
  14. Dalrymple, R.W., 2010, Tidal depositional systems, in James, N.P., and Dalrymple, R.W., eds., Facies Models 4: Geological Association of Canada, p. 201–231.
  15. Dalrymple, R.W., and Choi, K.S., 2003, Sediment transport by tides, in Middleton, G.V., ed., Encyclopedia of Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 606–609.
  16. Dalrymple, R.W., and Padman, L., 2019, Are tides controlled by latitude?, in Fraticelli, C.M., Markwick, P.J., Martinius, A.W., and Suter, J.R., eds., Latitudinal Controls on Stratigraphic Models and Sedimentary Concepts: Society for Sedimentary Geology, Special Publication, v. 108, p. 29–45, https://doi.org/10.2110/sepm-sp.108.03.
  17. Dalrymple, R.W., and Rhodes, R.N., 1995, Chapter 13 Estuarine dunes and bars, in Perillo, G.M.E., ed., Geomorphology and Sedimentology of Estuaries: Developments in Sedimentology, v. 53, p. 359–422, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-4571(05)80033-0.
  18. Dashtgard, S.E., 2011a, Neoichnology of the lower delta plain: Fraser River Delta, British Columbia, Canada: Implications for the ichnology of deltas: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 307, p. 98–108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.05.001.
  19. Dashtgard, S.E., 2011b, Linking invertebrate burrow distributions (neoichnology) to physicochemical stresses on a sandy tidal flat: Implications for the rock record: Sedimentology, v. 58, p. 1303–1325, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2010.01210.x.
  20. Dashtgard, S.E., and Gingras, M.K., 2007, Tidal controls on the morphology and sedimentology of gravel-dominated deltas and beaches: Examples from the megatidal Bay of Fundy, Canada: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 77, p. 1063–1077, https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2007.093.
  21. Dashtgard, S.E., and Gingras, M.K., 2012, Chapter 10 - Marine invertebrate neoichnology, in Knaust, D., and Bromley, R.G., eds., Trace Fossils as Indicators of Sedimentary Environments: Developments in Sedimentology, v. 64, p. 273–295, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53813-0.00010-1.
  22. Dashtgard, S.E., Gingras, M.K., and MacEachern, J.A., 2009, Tidally modulated shorefaces: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 79, p. 793–807, https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2009.084.
  23. Dashtgard, S.E., MacEachern, J.A., Frey, S.E., and Gingras, M.K., 2012, Tidal effects on the shoreface: Towards a conceptual framework: Sedimentary Geology, v. 279, p. 42–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2010.09.006.
  24. Davies, D.K., Etheridge, F.G., and Berg, R.R., 1971, Recognition of barrier environments: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 55, p. 550–565, https://doi.org/10.1306/5D25CFD3-16C1-11D7-8645000102C1865D.
  25. Davis Jr., R.A., and Hayes, M.O., 1984, What is a wave-dominated coast?: Marine Geology, v. 60, p. 313–329, https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(84)90155-5.
  26. Fan, D., 2012, Open-coast tidal flats, in Davis Jr., R.A., and Dalrymple, R.W., eds., Principles of Tidal Sedimentology: Springer, p. 187–29, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0123-6_9.
  27. Flemming, B.W., 2012, Siliciclastic back-barrier tidal flats, in Davis Jr., R.A., and Dalrymple, R.W., eds., Principles of Tidal Sedimentology: Springer, p. 231–267, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0123-6_10.
  28. Frey, S.E., and Dashtgard, S.E., 2011, Sedimentology, ichnology, and hydrodynamics of strait-margin, sand and gravel beaches and shorefaces: Juan de Fuca Strait, British Columbia, Canada: Sedimentology, v. 58, p. 1326–1346, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2010.01211.x.
  29. Galloway, W.E., 1975, Process framework for describing the morphologic and stratigraphic evolution of deltaic depositional systems, in Broussard, M.L., ed., Deltas, Models for Exploration: Houston Geological Society, p. 87–98.
  30. Galvin Jr., C.J., 1968, Breaker type classification on three laboratory beaches: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 73, p. 3651–3659, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i012p03651.
  31. Gingras, M.K., Pemberton, S.G., Saunders, T., and Clifton, H.E., 1999, The ichnology of modern and Pleistocene brackish-water deposits at Willapa Bay, Washington: variability in estuarine settings: Palaios, v. 14, p. 352–374, https://doi.org/10.2307/3515462.
  32. Hansen, C.D., and MacEachern, J.A., 2007, Application of the asymmetric delta model to along-strike facies variations in a mixed wave- and river-influenced delta lobe, Upper Cretaceous Basal Belly River Formation, central Alberta, in MacEachern, J.A., Bann, K.L., Gingras, M.K., and Pemberton, S.G, eds., Applied Ichnology: Society of Sedimentary Geology, Short Course Notes, v. 52, p. 256–272, https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.07.52.0256.
  33. Häntzschel, W., 1939, Tidal flat deposits (Wattenschlick), in Trask, P.D., ed., Recent Marine Sediments: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 195–206.
  34. Harris, P.T., Heap, A.D., Bryce, S.M., Porter-Smith, R., Ryan, D.A., and Heggie, D.T., 2002, Classification of Australian clastic coastal depositional environments based upon a quantitative analysis of wave, tidal, and river power: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 72 p. 858–870, https://doi.org/10.1306/040902720858.
  35. Hayes, M.O., 1967, Hurricanes as geological agents, south Texas coast: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 51, p. 937–942, https://doi.org/10.1306/5D25C0FF-16C1-11D7-8645000102C1865D.
  36. Jelby, M.E., Grundvåg, S.-A., Helland-Hansen, W., Olaussen, S., and Stemmerik, L., 2020, Tempestite facies variability and storm-depositional processes across a wide ramp: Towards a polygenetic model for hummocky cross-stratification: Sedimentology, v. 67, p. 742–781, https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12671.
  37. Kalifi, A., Sorrel, P., Leloup, P.-H., Spina, V., Huet, B., Galy, A., Rubino, J.-L., and Pittet, B., 2020, Changes in hydrodynamic process dominance (wave, tide or river) in foreland sequences: The subalpine Miocene Molasse revisited (France): Sedimentology, v. 67, p. 2455–2501, https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12708.
  38. Kellerhals, P., and Murray, J.W., 1969, Tidal flats at Boundary Bay, Fraser River Delta, British Columbia: Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 17, p. 67–91.
  39. Kumar, N., and Sanders, J.E., 1976, Characteristics of shoreface storm deposits: modern and ancient examples: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 46, p. 145–162, https://doi.org/10.1306/212F6EDD-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D.
  40. MacEachern, J.A., and Pemberton, S.G., 1992, Ichnological aspects of Cretaceous shoreface successions and shoreface variability in the Western Interior Seaway of North America, in Pemberton, S.G., ed., Applications of Ichnology to Petroleum Exploration: A Core Workshop: Society for Sedimentary Geology, Core Workshop Notes, v. 17, p. 57–84, https://doi.org/10.2110/cor.92.01.0057.
  41. MacEachern, J.A., Bann, K.L., Bhattacharya, J.P., and Howell Jr., C.D., 2005, Ichnology of deltas: Organism responses to the dynamic interplay of rivers, waves, storms, and tides, in Giosan, L., and Bhattacharya, J.P., eds., River Deltas–Concepts, Models, and Examples: Society for Sedimentary Geology, Special Publication, v. 83, p. 49–85, https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.05.83.0049.
  42. MacNaughton, R.B., Hagadorn, J.W., and Dott Jr., R.H., 2019, Cambrian wave-dominated tidal-flat deposits, central Wisconsin, USA: Sedimentology, v. 66, p. 1643–1672, https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12546.
  43. Masselink, G., and Hegge, B.J., 1995, Morphodynamics of meso- and macrotidal beaches: examples from central Queensland, Australia: Marine Geology, v. 129, p. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(95)00104-2.
  44. Masselink, G., and Short, A.D., 1993, The effect of tidal range on beach morphodynamics and morphology: a conceptual beach model: Journal of Coastal Research, v. 9, p. 785–800.
  45. Pemberton, S.G., MacEachern, J.A., Dashtgard, S.E., Bann, K.L., Gingras, M.K., and Zonneveld, J.-P., 2012, Chapter 19 – Shorefaces, in Knaust, D., and Bromley, R.G., eds., Trace Fossils as Indicators of Sedimentary Environments: Developments in Sedimentology, v. 64, p. 563–603, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53813-0.00019-8.
  46. Plint, A.G., 2010, Wave- and storm-dominated shoreline and shallow-marine systems, in James, N.P., and Dalrymple, R.W., eds., Facies Models 4: Geological Association of Canada, p. 167–199.
  47. Plint, A.G., and Walker, R.G., 1987, Cardium Formation 8. Facies and environments of the Cardium shoreline and coastal plain in the Kakwa field and adjacent areas, northwestern Alberta: Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 35, p. 48–64.
  48. Pritchard, D., and Hogg, A.J., 2003, Cross-shore sediment transport and the equilibrium morphology of mudflats under tidal currents: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 108, 3313, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001570.
  49. Psuty, N.P., 1967, The geomorphology of beach ridges in Tabasco, Mexico: Louisiana State University Coastal Studies, v. 18, 51 p.
  50. Reading, H.G., ed., 1996, Sedimentary Environments, Processes, Facies and Stratigraphy: Blackwell Science Ltd., 704 p.
  51. Reineck, H.-E., 1967, Layered sediments in tidal flats, beaches, and shelf bottoms of the North Sea, in Lauff, G.H., ed., Estuaries: American Association for the Advancement of Science, p. 191–206.
  52. Reineck, H.-E., 1975, German North Sea tidal flats, in Ginsburg, R.N., ed., Tidal Deposits: A Casebook of Recent Examples and Fossil Counterparts: Springer-Verlag, p. 5–12, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88494-8_1.
  53. Rivers, J.M., Dalrymple, R.W., Yousif, R., Al-Shaikh, I., Butler, J.D., Warren, C., Skeat, S.L., and Abdel Bari, E.M.M., 2020, Mixed siliciclastic-carbonate-evaporite sedimentation in an arid eolian landscape: The Khor Al Adaid tide-dominated coastal embayment, Qatar: Sedimentary Geology, v. 408, 105730, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2020.105730.
  54. Short, A.D., 1984, Beach and nearshore facies: southeast Australia: Marine Geology, v. 60, p. 261–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(84)90153-1.
  55. Short, A.D., 1991, Macro-meso tidal beach morphodynamics – an overview: Journal of Coastal Research, v. 7, p. 417–436.
  56. Short, A.D., ed., 1999, Handbook of Beach and Shoreface Morphodynamics: John Wiley and Sons, 392 p.
  57. Siddiqui, N.A., Rahman, A.H.A., Sum, C.W., Yusoff, W.I.W., and bin Ismail, M.S., 2017, Shallow-marine sandstone reservoirs, depositional environments, stratigraphic characteristics and facies model: A review: Journal of Applied Sciences, v. 17, p. 212–237, https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2017.212.237.
  58. Sleveland, A.R.N., Midtkandal, I., Galland, O., and Leanza, H.A., 2020, Sedimentary architecture of storm-influenced tidal flat deposits of the Upper Mulichinco Formation, Neuquén Basin, Argentina: Frontiers in Earth Science, v. 8, 219, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00219.
  59. Smosna, R., and Bruner, K.R., 2016, A tide-dominated beach from the Cambro–Ordovician Cabos Formation of northwestern Spain: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 86, p. 1378–1398, https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2016.84.
  60. Swinbanks, D.D., and Murray, J.W., 1981, Biosedimentological zonation of Boundary Bay tidal flats, Fraser River Delta, British Columbia: Sedimentology, v. 28, p. 201–237, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1981.tb01677.x.
  61. Vakarelov, B.K., Ainsworth, R.B., and MacEachern, J.A., 2012, Recognition of wave- dominated, tide-influenced shoreline systems in the rock record: Variations from a microtidal shoreline model: Sedimentary Geology, v. 279, p. 23–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2011.03.004.
  62. Van Straaten, L.M.J.U., 1961, Sedimentation in tidal flat areas: Alberta Society of Petroleum Geologists Journal, v. 9, p. 203–226.
  63. Van Straaten, L.M.J.U., and Kuenen, P.H., 1957, Accumulation of fine grained sediments in the Dutch Wadden Sea: Geologie en Mijnbouw, v. 19, p. 329–354.
  64. Van Straaten, L.M.U., and Kuenen, Ph.H., 1958, Tidal action as a cause of clay accumulation: Journal of Sedimentary Reaserch, v. 28, p. 406–413, https://doi.org/10.1306/74D70826-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D.
  65. Vaucher, R., Pittet, B., Hormière, H., Martin, E.L.O., and Lefebvre, B., 2017, A wave-dominated, tide-modulated model for the Lower Ordovician of the Anti- Atlas, Morocco: Sedimentology, v. 64, p. 777–807, https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12327.
  66. Vaucher, R., Pittet, B., Passot, S., Grandjean, P., Humbert, T., and Allemand, P., 2018a, Bedforms in a tidally modulated ridge and runnel shoreface (Berck- Plage; North France): implications for the geological record: Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France (BSGF) - Earth Sciences Bulletin, v. 189, 5, https://doi.org/10.1051/bsgf/2018004.
  67. Vaucher, R., Pittet, B., Humbert, T., and Ferry, S., 2018b, Large-scale bedforms induced by supercritical flows and wave-wave interference in the intertidal zone (Cap Ferret, France): Geo-Marine Letters, v. 38, p. 287–305, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-017-0526-2.
  68. Vaucher, R., Vaccari, N.E., Balseiro, D., Muñoz, D.F., Dillinger, A., Waisfeld, B.G., and Buatois, L.A., 2020, Tectonic controls on late Cambrian–Early Ordovician deposition in Cordillera oriental (Northwest Argentina): International Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 109, p. 1897–1920, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-020-01879-9.
  69. Walker, R.G., 1984, Shelf and shallow marine sands, in Walker, R.G., ed., Facies Models, Second Edition: Geosciences Canada Reprint Series No. 1, Geological Association of Canada, p. 141–170.
  70. Wang, Y.-Y., Wang, X.-Q., Hu, B., and Luo, M., 2019, Tomographic reconstructions of crab burrows from deltaic tidal flat: Contribution to palaeoecology of decapod trace fossils in coastal settings: Palaeoworld, v. 28, p. 514–524, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2019.04.003.
  71. Wei, X., Steel, R.J., Ravnås, R., Jiang, Z., Olariu, C., and Li, Z., 2016, Variability of tidal signals in the Brent Delta Front: New observations on the Rannoch Formation, northern North Sea: Sedimentary Geology, v. 335, p. 166–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.02.012.
  72. Weimer, R.J., Howard, J.D., and Lindsay, D.R., 1982, Tidal flats and associated tidal channels, in Scholle, P.A., and Spearing, D., eds., Sandstone Depositional Environments: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 191–245.
  73. Yang, B.C., and Chang, T.S., 2018, Integrated sedimentological and ichnological characteristics of a wave-dominated, macrotidal coast: a case study from the intertidal shoreface of the Dongho coast, southwest Korea: Geo-Marine Letters, v. 38, p. 139–151, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-017-0521-7.
  74. Yang, B.C., Dalrymple, R.W., and Chun, S.S., 2005, Sedimentation on a wave-dominated, open-coast tidal flat, south-western Korea: a summer tidal flat - winter shoreface: Sedimentology, v. 52, p. 235–252, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2004.00692.x.
  75. Yang, B.C., Dalrymple, R.W., and Chun, S.S., 2006, The significance of hummocky cross-stratification (HCS) wavelengths: evidence from an open-coast tidal flat, South Korea: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 76, p. 2–8, https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2006.01.
  76. Yang, B.C., Gingras, M.K., Pemberton, S.G., and Dalrymple, R.W., 2008a, Wave-generated tidal bundles as an indicator of wave-dominated tidal flats: Geology, v. 36, p. 39–42, https://doi.org/10.1130/G24178A.1.
  77. Yang, B.C., Dalrymple, R.W., Chun, S.S., Johnson, M.F., and Lee, H.J., 2008b, Tidally modulated storm sedimentation on open-coast tidal flats, southwestern coast of Korea: distinguishing tidal-flat from shoreface storm deposits, in Hampson, G.J., Steel, R.J., Burgess, P.B., and Dalrymple, R.W., eds., Recent Advances in Models of Siliciclastic Shallow-Marine Stratigraphy: Society for Sedimentary Geology, Special Publication, v. 90, p. 161–176, https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.08.90.0161.
  78. Yang, B.C., Dalrymple, R.W., Gingras, M.K., and Pemberton, S.G., 2009, Autogenic occurrence of Glossifungites Ichnofacies: Examples from wave-dominated, macrotidal flats, southwestern coast of Korea: Marine Geology, v. 260, p. 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2009.01.008.
  79. Zhang, X., Dalrymple, R.W., and Lin, C.M., 2018, Facies and stratigraphic architecture of the late Pleistocene to early Holocene tide-dominated paleo-Changjiang (Yangtze River) delta: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 130, p. 455–483, https://doi.org/10.1130/B31663.1.