Vol. 51 No. 3 (2024)
Articles

National-Scale Geospatial Modelling of Pyrrhotite in Bedrock Across Canada: A Pilot Study

Ian W. Honsberger
Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0E8, Canada
Angela Ford
Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0E8, Canada
Daniel McDonald
Department of National Defence, Mapping and Charting Establishment, 101 Goldenrod Drive, 2-A007, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0K2, Canada

Published 2024-10-11

Keywords

  • Aggregate,
  • Concrete,
  • Distribution,
  • Maps,
  • North America,
  • Sulphide
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Honsberger, I. W., Ford, A., & McDonald, D. (2024). National-Scale Geospatial Modelling of Pyrrhotite in Bedrock Across Canada: A Pilot Study. Geoscience Canada, 51(3), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.12789/geocanj.2024.51.213

Abstract

The most abundant iron sulphide minerals in igneous, metamorphic, and some sedimentary rocks are FeS2 (pyrite/marcasite) and Fe1-xS (pyrrhotite). The oxidation of pyrite and pyrrhotite in bedrock aggregates and mine tailings is undesirable to infrastructure and the environment because such chemical reactions are linked with concrete deterioration and acid mine drainage, respectively. The oxidation rate of pyrrhotite is up to one hundred times greater than that of pyrite; thus, pyrrhotite oxidation is of particular concern to society. Pyrrhotite-bearing concrete aggregates may lead to rapid expansion cracking and failure of critical concrete infrastructure including bridges, buildings, and houses, posing a significant safety concern. Additionally, premature disintegration of concrete requires replacement of concrete, leading to excessive aggregate resource extraction and associated increases in CO2 emissions. Considering the widespread concrete infrastructure across Canada, the distribution of pyrrhotite in bedrock used for aggregate is of fundamental importance to the short- and long-term safety of Canadians at the national, regional, and local scales.
  This pilot study details the initial steps taken to generate national-scale geospatial models of pyrrhotite occurrences in bedrock across Canada and illustrates the associated map products. In total, 12,577 known pyrrhotite occurrences were identified from publicly available provincial and territorial mineral occurrence datasets. The overall modelling strategy involved normalizing the number of pyrrhotite occurrences with respect to the total surface area of major bedrock types and characterizing three different classes of pyrrhotite occurrence density (< 1, 1–4, and 4–10 occurrences/1000 km2). The maps illustrate that pyrrhotite occurrence density is highest in volcanic rocks and undifferentiated sedimentary and volcanic rocks, moderate in intrusive and unknown rocks, and lowest in sedimentary and metamorphic rocks. Sedimentary rocks with no pyrrhotite occurrences span large surface areas across central-western Canada thus resulting in an overall low pyrrhotite occurrence density (< 1 occurrence/1000 km2) for this rock type, despite the fact that numerous pyrrhotite occurrences are identified in sedimentary rocks and may be abundant locally or regionally. Volcanic, undifferentiated sedimentary and volcanic, intrusive, and unknown rocks occur throughout the Canadian Shield of central and northern Canada, the Cordillera of western Canada, and the Appalachians of eastern Canada, but bedrock type and associated occurrence density are highly variable within these geological domains.
  Comparison of pyrrhotite occurrence density maps for Canada with pyrrhotite permissive geology maps for the United States of America illustrates that rocks with a high pyrrhotite occurrence density in Canada (volcanic rocks and undifferentiated sedimentary and volcanic rocks), are contiguous overall with areas of pyrrhotite potential in the United States. Inconsistencies across the international border reflect the differing methodologies and assumptions consisting of a statistically based approach for Canada and a qualitative approach for the United States. In the Cordillera and Appalachians, such discontinuities across the international border may reflect the underestimation of pyrrhotite occurrences in sedimentary rocks of Canada because of the impact of high surface area on the pyrrhotite occurrence density calculations.
  The maps presented herein are a first step in illustrating the distribution of pyrrhotite-bearing bedrock across Canada and greater North America. These national-scale map products are useful first-order references for selecting regions for follow-up studies on bedrock pyrrhotite occurrences. Regional and local geospatial analysis combined with field work for ground truthing will be important aspects of future research, especially in the vicinity of population centres where bedrock is utilized for concrete aggregate. Detailed regional and local studies of pyrrhotite occurrences in bedrock will help guide the extraction of safe concrete aggregate and contribute to the long-term sustainability of bedrock resources, safe infrastructure, and a habitable climate.

References

  1. Alberta Geological Survey, 2020, Metallic mineral occurrences (DIG 2019-0026): Alberta Energy Regulator/Alberta Geological Survey. Available from: https://geology-ags-aer.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets.
  2. Baker, M., Singhvi, A., and Mazzei, P., 2021, June 26, Engineer warned of ‘major structural damage’ at Florida condo complex (News Article): The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/26/us/miami-building-collapse-investigation.html.
  3. Belzile, N., Chen, Y-W., Cai, M-F., and Li, Y., 2004, A review on pyrrhotite oxidation: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, v. 84, p. 65–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2004.03.003.
  4. Bérard, J.R.R., Roux, R., and Durand, M., 1975, Performance of concrete containing a variety of black shale: Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, v. 2, p. 58–65, https://doi.org/10.1139/l75-006.
  5. Canadian Standards Association, 2019, Concrete materials and methods of concrete construction/test methods and standard practices for concrete (Edition: A23.1:19/CSA A23.2:19): Canadian Standards Association, 882 p. Available from: https://standards.globalspec.com/std/13365659/csa-a23-1-19-csa-a23-2-19.
  6. Casanova, I., Agulló, L., and Aguado, A., 1996, Aggregate expansivity due to sulfide oxidation – I. Reaction system and rate model: Cement and Concrete Research, v. 26, p. 993–998, https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(96)00085-3.
  7. Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, 2020, Pyrrhotite and crumbling concrete in Connecticut: Connecticut State Government, https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Geology/Pyrrhotite-and-Crumbling-Concrete.
  8. Corrigan, D., and van Breemen, O., 1997, U–Pb age constraints for the lithotectonic evolution of the Grenville Province along the Mauricie transect, Quebec: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 34, p. 299–316, https://doi.org/10.1139/e17-027.
  9. De Almeida Rodrigues, A., 2016, Concrete deterioration due to sulfide-bearing aggregates: Unpublished PhD thesis, Université Laval, 335 p., https://dam-oclc.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/8f348891-d14f-4d19-8cc7-f1a1b1abdd86.
  10. Duchesne, J., Rodrigues, A., and Fournier, B., 2021, Concrete damage due to oxidation of pyrrhotite-bearing aggregate: a review: RILEM Technical Letters, v. 6, p. 82–92, https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2021.138.
  11. Horng, C.-S., 2018, Unusual magnetic properties of sedimentary pyrrhotite in methane seepage sediments: Comparison with metamorphic pyrrhotite and sedimentary greigite: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, v. 123, p. 4601–4617, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB015262.
  12. Janzen, M.P., Nicholson, R.V., and Scharer, J.M., 2000, Pyrrhotite reaction kinetics: reaction rates for oxidation by oxygen, ferric iron, and for nonoxidative dissolution: Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta, v. 64, p. 1511–1522, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00421-4.
  13. Mauk, J.L., Crafford, T.C., Horton, J.D., San Juan, C.A., and Robinson Jr., G.R., 2020, Pyrrhotite distribution in the conterminous United States, 2020: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2020-3017, 4 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20203017.
  14. Nadeau, L., and Corrigan, D., 1991, Preliminary notes on the geology of the St. Maurice tectonic zone, Grenville Orogen, Québec: Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 91-1E, p. 245–255, https://doi.org/10.4095/132650.
  15. Nicholson, R.V., and Scharer, J.M., 1993, Laboratory studies of pyrrhotite oxidation kinetics, in Alpers, C.N., and Blowes, D.W., eds., Environmental Geochemistry of Sulfide Oxidation: ACS Symposium Series, v. 550, p. 14–30, https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1994-0550.ch002.
  16. Noël, C., 2020, SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise: The decision on the leading case: The facts, the parties, the legal issues, 2020 QCCA 495 (Newsletter): Robinson Sheppard Shapiro LLP, https://www.rsslex.com/en/publications/snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-1-introduction/.
  17. Ratcliffe, N.M., Stanley, R.S., Gale, M.H., Thompson, P.J., and Walsh, G.J., 2011, Bedrock geologic map of Ver¬mont: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3184, scale 1:100,000, 3 sheets.
  18. Rogers, C., 2014, What's new in the 2014 edition of CSA A23.1 and .2: Canadian Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute, 36 p., https://www.cpci.ca/files/news_events/news/1414579688_1.pdf.
  19. Tremblay, A., and Pinet, N., 2016, Late Neoproterozoic to Permian tectonic evolution of the Quebec Appalachians, Canada: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 160, p. 131–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.015.
  20. Wheeler, J.O., Hoffman, P.F., Card, K.D., Davidson, A., Sanford, B.V., Okulitch, A.V., and Roest, W.R., 1996, Geological map of Canada: Geological Survey of Canada, “A” Series Map, 1860A, https://doi.org/10.4095/208175.
  21. Wille, K., and Zhong, R., 2016, Investigating the deterioration of basement walls made of concrete in CT: Report for the Attorney General of the State of Connecticut, 93 p.
  22. Zhong, R., and Wille, K., 2018, Deterioration of residential concrete foundations: The role of pyrrhotite-bearing aggregate: Cement and Concrete Composites, v. 94, p. 53–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.08.012.