Redefining 'Community': The Elusive Legacy of the Dramatists' Co-op of Nova Scotia
Abstract
By many indications, playwriting in the Canadian Maritime provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island) has never been more accomplished, diverse, and energetic. At the same time, however, many dramatists in this region experience a distinct and, for some, defining sense of isolation and disconnection from the rest of the country, particularly in terms of production opportunities beyond the East Coast. Aware of the limitations of local production, however enthusiastic the support of regional theatre companies and groups, a significant number of Maritimes playwrights lament the absence of vehicles—such as publication with national distribution—that may lead to increased profile for Maritimes drama within this country and internationally. At this juncture, it is particularly intriguing to consider the precedent of the Dramatists' Co-op of Nova Scotia. A boisterous offspring of the Nova Scotia Writers Federation, the Co-op took upon itself the challenge to foster, promote, distribute, and generally champion Nova Scotian and, ultimately, Atlantic Canadian (including Newfoundland) drama for two decades following its inception in 1976. A fundamental difference between the dominant (although not exclusive) philosophy of Co-op members and their contemporary counterparts, however, is in the definition of the concept of ‘community.' For, unlike the distinctly national and international interests regularly expressed in the current context, the Co-op placed a significant (although, again, not exclusive) emphasis on the establishment of a local community of theatre artists and, even more fundamental, of local theatre audiences. The contrast, while neither simple nor absolute, provides a productive point of entry into the complex reality of contemporary Maritimes dramatic practice. Plusieurs signes nous montrent que l'écriture théâtrale des provinces maritimes canadiennes (Nouvelle Ecosse, Nouveau Brunswick et l'Ile du Prince Edouard), n'a jamais été aussi accomplie, variée et vivante. Mais, en meme temps, beaucoup d'auteurs dramatiques de cette région se sentent separés, sinon isolés, du reste du pays concernant la production de leurs pièces audelà de la côte est. Conscients des restrictions d'une production limitée aux provinces maritimes, malgré l'aide enthousiaste des compagnies et des groupes régionnaux théâtraux, plusieurs auteurs dramatiques se lamentent du manque de publicité et de l'absence de diffusion nationale qui pourrait faire reconnaître leurs pièces dramatiques à l'échelle nationale et internationale. À ce moment, cela nous intrigue de penser au précédent de la "Dramatists' Co-op of Nova Scotia." Progéniture tapageuse de la "Nova Scotia Writers Federation," la Coopérative a pris en charge le défi d'encourager, de promouvoir et de distribuer les pièces de Nouvelle Ecosse, aussi bien que celles de l'est du Canada (y compris Terre Neuve), pendant les vingt années qui suivirent sa conception en 1976. Mais il y a entre les membres de la Coopérative et ses contemporains une distinction philosophique dans la définition du concept ‘communauté' qui va à l'encontre du terme dans les intérêts nationaux et internationaux. La Coopérative a donc insisté sur l'importance de la collectivité, de la localité de la communauté artistique, et encore plus, sur son public potentiel. Le contraste, ni simple ni absolu, permet un point d'insertion dans l'exercice compliqué du théâtre maritime canadien d'aujourd'hui.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. The Editors will be responsible for the usual functions of copyediting on this article. The Author will be given an opportunity to review the final version of the article (prior to typesetting), but if (s)he fails to return it by the date requested, production and publication will proceed without the Author's approval.
2. The Author undertakes that permission to publish the article has not been assigned previously elsewhere.
3. The Author agrees to provide copies of letters of permission to reproduce material from other publications in this contribution where such permission is required.
4. The Author agrees to secure all permissions required for the printing of photos or illustrations.
5. The Author is entitled to two free (print) copies of the issue in which the article appears.
6. The Author agrees to refer to the Editors any subsequent requests to publish the article or substantial portion thereof in any printed or electronic publication. The Journal will normally obtain a standard fee for reprinting, the amount of this fee to be fixed from time to time; this fee will be divided equally with the Author. The Editors will accede to any requests by the Author to use part or all of the article in a work published under the Author's exclusive or joint authorship or editorship, provided that suitable acknowledgment of its first appearance is made, and in such cases no fee for reprinting shall be payable to the Journal. The purpose of this clause is to protect both the Author and Journal from unauthorized or illegitimate use of the article.
7. If requested by the Author in advance in any particular case, the fee for reprinting may be waived by the Editors.
Additional or Alternative Clauses: Subject to the above conditions, and in consideration of the Publisher undertaking to subsidize costs of the publication of the article, the Author assigns to the Journal the exclusive world rights to the article in its present, or substantially its present form (in both print and electronic publication), and the parties agree upon the foregoing terms for themselves and their respective executors, administrators, assigns or successors.