The Political Poetics of Contrastive Identifications: Scripting Ongoing Events Through Master/Counter Positioning in Populist Political Speech
Keywords:
identification, moral disorder, narrative positioning, political persuasion, public speechAbstract
The article reports an empirical inquiry into the rhetorical use of master/counter juxtapositions in narrating an ongoing scene of political action. Drawing on the studies of institutional interaction, it investigates the institutional setting of public political speeches, focusing on the empirical example of Donald Trump’s public speech in the rally after the election results and just before the violent invasion of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. My research approaches master/counter positioning as a multilayered relational constellation of identifications mobilized in the telling and deployed strategically for specific institutional purposes. I am interested in counter-narratives as interpretative discursive frames superimposed on surrounding socio-material circumstances to refute an alternative (pre-existing and prevailing) interpretation of reality. My take on the concept as a multifaceted rhetorical resource subsumes the aspects of an act of contestation, a breach of cultural orders, and a mission towards emancipation, albeit in a slightly modified version of the conventionalized definitions. In the context of political interaction, that is, in institutional activities connected to ongoing processes in policy-making and governance, counter-narratives are world-breaking but they are also world-making in a decidedly concrete consequential manner, firstly, by building on institutional continuities, virtues, and legitimacies, and secondly, by addressing recipients as co-actors, projecting identifications on them and expecting them to assume a role in the political participation field at hand. Applying tools from small story research, membership categorization analysis, epistemic governance and narrative positioning analysis, I explore the purposeful evocation of contrastive storylines in political rhetoric. The article aims to shed light on the argumentative use of counter-narratives in a political line of action.
References
Abbas, A. H. (2019). Super-hyperbolic man: Hyperbole as an ideological discourse strategy in Trump’s speeches. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 32(2), 505-522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09621-8
Alasuutari, P. (2015). The discursive side of new institutionalism. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 162–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514561805
Alasuutari, P. & Qadir, A. (2014). Epistemic governance. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 67–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.887986
Al Dilaimy, H., Al-Rawe, M., & Suleiman, S. (2022). Donald Trump’s Aggressive and Offensive Language Before and After His Inauguration Speeches. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 3(1), 1–9.
Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work. Ashgate. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315252209
Asif, N. (2023). The Role of Symbolic Politics in Shaping Political Attitudes. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/1777/
Bager, A. S., Lueg K. & Lundholt, M. F. (2021) Concluding remarks: narrative processuality and future research avenues for counter narrative studies. In k. Lueg & M. W. Lundholt (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Counter-Narratives (pp. 442–461). Routledge.
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of narrative and life history, 7(1-4), 335–342.
Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & talk, 28 (3), 377–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
Bamberg, M., & Wipff, Z. (2020). Reconsidering counter-narratives. In K. Lueg & M. W. Lundholt (Eds.) Routledge handbook of counter-narratives (pp. 70–82). Routledge.
Begzjav, O., & Nyamsuren, K. (2023). Features of Political Euphemisms in President Donald Trump’s Speeches. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 13(6), 912–923. DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2023.136053
Björninen, S., Hatavara, M., & Mäkelä, M. (2020). Narrative as social action. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(4), 437–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1721971
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press.
Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V.A. (2018). Ideational Power and Pathways to Legitimation in the Euro Crisis. Review of International Political Economy 25 (6): 753–778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1512892
Conklin, M. (2021). Capitol Offense: Is Donald Trump Guilty of Inciting a Riot at the Capitol? U. St. Thomas JL & Pub. Pol'y, 15, 483. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/tjlpp15&div=18&id=&page=
Davies, B., & Harrè, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.
Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (eds.) (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge University Press.
Fanani, A., Setiawan, S., Purwati, O., Maisarah, M., & Qoyyimah, U. (2020). Donald Trump’s grammar of persuasion in his speech. Heliyon, 6(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03082
Febriana, S. W., & Fajariah, M. F. (2018). The analysis speech acts of Donald Trump’s speech. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 1(5), 573.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H. (2006). Seeing Sociologically. Paradigm.
Gea, D. (2020). Commissive speech act in Donald Trump’s speech campaign. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 8(2), 350–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34050/jib.v8i2.11781
Georgakopoulou, A. (2006). Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. Narrative inquiry, 16(1), 122-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.16geo
Georgakopoulou, A. (2007). Small stories, interaction and identities. (Vol. 8). John Benjamins Publishing.
Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Harvard University Press.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 2, 115–131.
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of Public Sphere. Polity Press.
Hall, J. (2021). In search of enemies: Donald Trump’s populist foreign policy rhetoric. Politics, 41(1), 48–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720935377
Hamed, D. M. (2022). Trump's January 6 address: Hate speech or freedom of speech? A transdisciplinary study. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 4(5), 438–456.
Henricksen, W., & Betz, B. (2022). The stolen election lie and the freedom of speech. Penn Statim, 127, 111. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/statim127&div=10&id=&page=
Hidalgo-Tenorio, E., & Benítez-Castro, M. Á. (2022). Trump’s populist discourse and affective politics, or on how to move ‘the People’ through emotion. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20(2), 86–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1861540
Housley, W. & Fitzgerald, R. (2007). Categorization, interaction, policy and debate. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 187–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464840
Hyvärinen, M. (2016). Expectations and Experientiality: Jerome Bruner's “Canonicity and Breach”. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 8(2), 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5250/storyworlds.8.2.0001
Hyvärinen, M. (2020). Toward a Theory of Counter-Narratives: Narrative Contestation, Cultural Canonicity, and Tellability. In K. Lueg & M. Lundholt (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Counter-Narratives (pp. 17–29). Routledge.
Hyvärinen, M. & Hatavara, M. & Rautajoki, H. (2021). Positioning with Master and Counter-Narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 31(1), 97–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.20014.hyv
Ivana, P. S. I., & Suprayogi, S. (2020). The representation of Iran and United States in Donald Trump’s speech: A critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 40–45.
Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorization and the Moral Order. Routledge.
Jordan, L. S., & Dykes, D. (2022). “If you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country”: An intersectional settler colonial analysis of Trump’s “Save America” speech and other messages of (non) belonging. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 22(5), 443–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086221093947
Kadim, E. N. (2022). A critical discourse analysis of Trump's election campaign speeches. Heliyon, 8(4). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09256
Krasner, M. A. (2023). Tweets, Taunts, Tirades, and Tantrums: How America’s Donald Trump Transformed Transgressive Language into Political Power. In Debasing Political Rhetoric (pp. 201–218). Springer Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0894-3_12
König, H. D. (2023). Performing as a Firefighter: Reconstruction of Donald Trump's Speech on the Storming of the Capitol Through Depth Hermeneutics. In Forum: Qualitative Social Research 24(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.3.4029
Lacatus, C. (2021). Populism and President Trump’s approach to foreign policy: An analysis of tweets and rally speeches. Politics, 41(1), 31–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720935380
Lee, C. S., Merizalde, J., Colautti, J. D., An, J., & Kwak, H. (2022). Storm the capitol: linking offline political speech and online Twitter extra-representational participation on QAnon and the January 6 insurrection. Frontiers in Sociology, 7, 876070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.876070
Meretoja, H. (2018). The ethics of storytelling: Narrative hermeneutics, history, and the possible. Oxford University Press.
Ntontis, E., Jurstakova, K., Neville, F., Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2024). A warrant for violence? An analysis of Donald Trump's speech before the US Capitol attack. British journal of social psychology, 63(1), 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12679
Phelan, J. (2008). Narratives in contest; or, another twist in the narrative turn. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 123(1), 166-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2008.123.1.166
Rautajoki, H. (2009). Staging Public Discussion. In Richard Fitzgerald & William Housley (Eds.) Media, Policy and Interaction. Ashgate, 88–109.
Rautajoki, H. (2012). Membership categorization as a tool for moral casting in TV discussion: The dramaturgical consequentiality of guest introductions. Discourse Studies, 14:2 243–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611433637
Rautajoki, H. (2022). Relational scaffolding of justifications in policy-making: Deploying the multi standard of identifications in EU policy negotiation. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 11(2), 255–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2022.2142143
Rautajoki, H. (2023). Actualizing societal membership in imaginary interaction: The ‘real construction of society’ in the opening of current affairs TV discussion. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1228498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1228498
Rautajoki, H. & Fitzgerald, R. (2022). Populating ‘Solidarity’ in Political Debate: Interrelational Strategies of Persuasion within the European Parliament in the Aftermath of the Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics, 21(5), 763–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21023.rau
Rautajoki, H. & Hyvärinen M. (2021). Aspects of voice in the use of narrative positioning in polyphonic storytelling. Ventriloquial moves within a biographical interview. Journal of Interdisciplinary Voice Studies 6(1), 55–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/jivs_00037_1
Rautajoki, H. & Pi Ferrer, L. (2023). Shadowboxing in silence: Balancing with European Semester guidelines in national parliamentary debates on economic policies. Critical Policy Studies. 17 (3), 351–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2101015
Rautajoki, H., Hatavara, M. & Hyvärinen, M. (2023). Projective small stories invoking policy paths in parliamentary debates: Narrating outcome, performance and responsibilities. In A. Georgakopoulou, K. Giaxoglou & S. Patron (Eds.) Small stories research: Tales, tellings, and tellers across contexts. Routledge, 185–203. DOI: 10.4324/9781003253563-13
Reyes, A. (2020). I, Trump: The cult of personality, anti-intellectualism and the Post-truth era. Journal of language and politics, 19(6), 869–892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20002.rey
Reyes, A., & Ross, A. (2021). From the White House with anger: Conversational features in President Trump's official communication. Language & Communication, 77, 46–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.12.003
Rong, J. (2021). An analysis on stylistic features of Donald Trump’s speech. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(3), 11–18. DOI:10.5539/ijel.v11n3p11
Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumberz & D. Hymes (Eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics (pp. 325–345). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on Conversation, volumes I and II. (Ed.) G. Jefferson. Blackwell.
Schaefer, D. O. (2020). Whiteness and civilization: Shame, race, and the rhetoric of Donald Trump. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(1), 1–18.
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
Schmidt, V. (2017). Theorizing ideas and discourse in political science. Critical Review, 29(2), 248–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1366665
Sigurdardottir, H., & Rautajoki, H. (2024). Embodying scenes of moral disorder: Bodily gestures as a site of signification in feminist TikTok activism. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 6(1), 11–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2024-0002
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. The making of modern identity. Harvard University Press
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Duke University Press.
Taylor, M. (2021). Some preliminary thoughts prompted by President Trump’s 6 January Speech: Words, enemies, affordances. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(5), 907–911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1932337
Valcore, J., Asquith, N. L., & Rodgers, J. (2023). “We’re led by stupid people”: Exploring Trump’s use of denigrating and deprecating speech to promote hatred and violence. Crime, law and social change, 80(3), 237–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-023-10085-y
Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2018). Is Trump always rambling like a fourth-grade student? Discourse & Society, 29(3), 299–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734659
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright for articles published in Narrative Works is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to Narrative Works. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
