What Shared Reading Can Do: A Review of the Literature
Keywords:
shared reading; literature; communal meaning-making; literature-based interventions; literature reviewAbstract
Shared reading is a relatively new type of reading intervention which aims to improve the wellbeing of participants by reading literary texts, mostly in non-educational settings. In order to find out whether shared reading can live up to its aims, we present and synthesize the existing scholarship on the effects of shared reading. To this end we have selected all the available studies up till 2024. The rapidly developing research into shared reading, which uses various theoretical perspectives and methodologies across disciplines, points towards impacts that we discuss as three interrelated aspects: emotional engagement, acquaintance with new perspectives, and the establishment of social connections and collaborative practices. We discuss the advantages and limitations of the various research methods used in scholarship on shared reading, and point to the potential of shared reading in the context of education.
References
Andersen, Tine Riis. 2022. ‘Regaining Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness: Experiences from Two Shared Reading Groups for People Diagnosed with Cancer’. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (November):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017166.
Andersen, Tine Riis, and Frank Hakemulder. 2024. ‘“The Poem Has Stayed with Me”: Continued Processing and Impact from Shared Reading Experiences of People Living with Cancer’. Poetics 102 (February):101847.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101847.
Billington, Josie. 2011. ‘“Reading for Life”: Prison Reading Groups in Practice and Theory’. Critical Survey 23 (3): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.3167/cs.2011.230306.
Billington, Josie, Janine Carroll, Philip Davis, Christine Healey, and Peter Kinderman. 2013. ‘A Literature-Based Intervention for Older People Living with Dementia’. Perspectives in Public Health 133 (3): 165–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913912470052.
Billington, Josie, Philip Davis, and Grace Farrington. 2013. ‘Reading as Participatory Art: An Alternative Mental Health Therapy’. Journal of Arts & Communities 5 (1): 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1386/jaac.5.1.25_1.
Billington, Josie, Philip Davis, Grace Farrington, Kelda Green, Fiona Magee, Mette Steenberg, and Thor Magnus Tangeraas. 2019. ‘Qualitative Methods II: Developing Innovative Qualitative Approaches in Research on Reading and Health’. In Reading and Mental Health, edited by Josie Billington, 191–240. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21762-4_10.
Billington, Josie, Grace Farrington, Sofia Lampropoulou, Jamie Lingwood, Andrew Jones, James Ledson, Kate McDonnell, Nicky Duirs, and Anne-Louise Humphreys. 2017. ‘A Comparative Study of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Shared Reading for Chronic Pain’. Medical Humanities 43 (3): 155–65. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2016-011047.
Billington, Josie, Eleanor Longden, and Jude Robinson. 2016. ‘A Literature-Based Intervention for Women Prisoners: Preliminary Findings’. International Journal of Prisoner Health 12 (4): 230–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-09-2015-0031.
Billington, Josie, and Mette Steenberg. 2021. ‘Literary Reading and Mental Wellbeing’. In Handbook of Empirical Literary Studies, edited by Don Kuiken and Arthur M. Jacobs, 393–420. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110645958-016.
Blundell, Judith, and Simon Poole. 2023. ‘Poetry in a Pandemic. Digital Shared Reading for Wellbeing’. Journal of Poetry Therapy 36 (3): 197–209.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08893675.2022.2148135.
Canning, Patricia. 2017. ‘Text World Theory and Real World Readers: From Literature to Life in a Belfast Prison’. Language and Literature 26 (2): 172–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704731.
———. 2020. ‘“I Loved the Stories – They Weren’t Boring”: Narrative Gaps, the “Disnarrated” and the Significance of Style in Prison Reading Groups’. In The Edinburgh History of Reading: A World Survey from Antiquity to the Present, edited by Mary Hammond and Jonathan Rose, 333–50. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474461924-019.
Chapple, Melissa, Philip Davis, Josie Billington, and Rhiannon Corcoran. 2023. ‘Exploring the Different Cognitive, Emotional and Imaginative Experiences of Autistic and Non-Autistic Adult Readers When Contemplating Serious Literature as Compared to Non-Fiction’. Frontiers in Psychology 14:1001268. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1001268.
Christiansen, Charlotte Ettrup. 2021. ‘Does Fiction Reading Make Us Better People? Empathy and Morality in a Literary Empowerment Programme’. Ethnos 88 (5): 994–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2021.2007158.
Christiansen, Charlotte Ettrup, and Anne Line Dalsgård. 2021. ‘The Day We Were Dogs: Mental Vulnerability, Shared Reading, and Moments of Transformation’. Ethos 49 (3): 286–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12319.
———. 2023. ‘Together and Apart: Shared Reading as an Embodied and Intersubjective Ritual of Resonance’. In The Ethnography of Reading at Thirty, edited by Matthew Rosen, 149–70. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38226-0_9.
Cornelissen, Gertrud. 2016. Maar als je erover nadenkt…: Een jaar literatuuronderwijs in groepen 7 en 8 van de basisschool. Eburon Uitgeverij B.V.
Davis, Jane. 2018. ‘“Something Real to Carry Home When Day Is Done”: The Reader in Future’. Essays and Studies 71:210–17.
Davis, P., F. Magee, K. Koleva, T. M. Tangerås, Elisabeth L. Hill, Helen Baker, and Laura Crane. 2016. ‘What Literature Can Do: An Investigation into the Effectiveness of Shared Reading as a Whole Population Health Intervention’. Report. University of Liverpool. https://www.thereader.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/What-Literature-Can-Do.pdf.
Davis, Philip, and Josie Billington. 2016. ‘The Very Grief a Cure of the Disease’. Changing English 23 (4): 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2016.1194188.
———. 2020a. ‘Chapter 14 “A Bolt Is Shot Back Somewhere in the Breast” (Matthew Arnold, “The Buried Life”): A Methodology for Literary Reading in the Twenty-First Century’. In The Edinburgh History of Reading: Modern Readers, edited by Mary Hammond, 283–305. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474446129-017.
———. 2020b. ‘Reading’. In The Routledge Companion to Health Humanities. Routledge.
Davis, Philip, and Fiona Magee. 2020a. Reading. Arts for Health. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=2457017&site=ehost-live.
———. 2020b. ‘Sudden Dignity in the Act of Reading’. Literature and Medicine 38 (2): 262–81.
‘De Culturele Apotheek (Netherlands)’. n.d. Culturele Apotheek. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://www.cultureleapotheek.nl/.
Dowrick, Christopher, Josie Billington, Jude Robinson, Andrew Hamer, and Clare Williams. 2012. ‘Get into Reading as an Intervention for Common Mental Health Problems: Exploring Catalysts for Change’. Medical Humanities 38 (1): 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2011-010083.
Eekhof, L. S. 2024. Reading the Mind. The Relationship Between Social Cognition and Narrative Processing. s.l. : s.n. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/296424.
Elfenbein, Andrew. 2018. The Gist of Reading. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uunl/detail.action?docID=5178043.
Fagerlid, Cicilie. 2023. ‘Reading for Sharing’. In The Ethnography of Reading at Thirty, edited by Matthew Rosen, 171–94. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38226-0_10.
Felski, Rita. 2008. Uses of Literature. John Wiley & Sons.
———. 2020. Hooked: Art and Attachment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo58870481.html.
Gray, Ellie, Gundi Kiemle, Philip Davis, and Josie Billington. 2016. ‘Making Sense of Mental Health Difficulties through Live Reading: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the Experience of Being in a Reader Group’. Arts & Health 8 (3): 248–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2015.1121883.
Gumbricht, Hans Ulrich. 2012. Atmosphere, Mood, Stimmung. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/literary-studies-and-literature/atmosphere-mood-stimmung.
Gustafsson, Anna W., Per Johnsson, Kajsa Järvholm, Katarina Bernhardsson, Torbjörn Forslid, and Anders Ohlsson. 2022. ‘An Intricate Dance of Intersubjectivity: The Social and Cognitive Benefits of a Digital Shared Reading Group’. Scientific Study of Literature 12 (1–2): 103–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.22010.gus.
Harsh, Esther Valora. 2022. ‘A Study into Shared Reading Groups, with Specific Relation to Religious Reading’. Frontiers in Psychology 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025914.
‘Het Lezerscollectief – Samen sterke verhalen lezen (Belgium)’. n.d. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://lezerscollectief.be/nl/.
Hodge, S., J. Robinson, and P. Davis. 2007. ‘Reading between the Lines: The Experiences of Taking Part in a Community Reading Project’. Medical Humanities 33 (2): 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmh.2006.000256.
Holm, Marie-Elisabeth Lei, Peter Simonsen, Mette Marie Kristensen, and Anna Paldam Folker. 2022. ‘Poetry Prescribed for Loneliness: Shared Reading for Men Near Retirement’. In Narrative Medicine in Education, Practice, and Interventions, edited by Anders Juhl Rasmussen, Anne-Marie Mai, and Helle Ploug Hansen, 153–66. Anthem Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/narrative-medicine-in-education-practice-and-interventions/poetry-prescribed-for-loneliness-shared-reading-for-men-near-retirement/C5F6EC1B39FC47315EB9115AB2DB3C9C.
‘How Storytelling Connects People’. n.d. Education - Utrecht University. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://www.uu.nl/en/education/how-storytelling-connects-people.
‘International Shared Reading’. n.d. The Reader. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://www.thereader.org.uk/shared-reading-wwd/international-shared-reading/.
Jones, Susan, and Kevin Harvey. 2015. ‘“He Should Have Put Them in the Freezer”: Creating and Connecting through Shared Reading’. Journal of Arts & Communities 7 (3): 153–66. https://doi.org/10.1386/jaac.7.3.153_1.
———. 2020. ‘Participation, Perplexity and Plurality: Exploring the Shared Reading of a “Difficult” Poem’. Changing English 27 (1): 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2019.1702455.
Koopman, Eva Maria (Emy). 2016. ‘Effects of “Literariness” on Emotions and on Empathy and Reflection after Reading’. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 10 (1): 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000041.
———. 2018. ‘Does Originality Evoke Understanding? The Relation between Literary Reading and Empathy’. Review of General Psychology 22 (2): 169–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000107.
Kristensen, Mette Marie, Morten Hulvej Rod, Peter Simonsen, and Anna Paldam Folker. 2024. ‘“You Come as a Human Being…”: Exploring Sense of Equality in Arts Interventions through an Ethnographic Study of Shared Reading’. Medical Humanities, July. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2024-012963.
Kristensen, Mette Marie, Peter Simonsen, Marie-Elisabeth Lei Holm, Mette Steenberg, Josefine Ranfelt Andersen, Sarah Elizabeth Hvidberg, and Anna Paldam Folker. 2020. ‘Shared Reading as Mental Health Promotion Among Newly Retired Men: Design of a Feasibility Study’. Nordic Journal of Arts, Culture and Health 2 (2): 107–21. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-7913-2020-02-03.
Kristensen, Mette Marie, Peter Simonsen, Marie-Elisabeth Lei Pihl, Morten Hulvej Rod, and Anna Paldam Folker. 2023. ‘“We’re Opening 20 Doors!“: Exploring the Collective Dimensions of Shared Reading as Mental Health Promotion among Newly Retired Men in Denmark’. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 8 (1): 100639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100639.
Kuijpers, Moniek M. 2018. ‘Bibliotherapy in the Age of Digitization’. First Monday, September. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i10.9429.
Kuiken, Don. 2019. ‘Reading and Psychology II. Metaphoricity, Inexpressible Realisations and Expressive Enactment’. In Reading and Mental Health, edited by Josie Billington, 345–57. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21762-4_16.
‘Læseforeningen (Denmark)’. 2024. Læseforeningen. 13 October 2024. https://www.laeseforeningen.dk.
Lampropoulou, Sofia, Kremena Koleva, Kevin Harvey, Gavin Brookes, and Philip Davis. 2019.
‘Linguistic Approaches’. In Reading and Mental Health, edited by Josie Billington, 241–63. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21762-4_11.
Langer, Judith A. 1995. Envisioning Literature: Literary Understanding and Literature Instruction. Teachers College Press.
Lawrence, Clare. 2022. ‘Dancing with the Daffodils: Using a Shared Reading Approach to Explore Autistic Identity’. Good Autism Practice (GAP) 23 (1): 5–13.
Levine, Sarah, Karoline Trepper, Rosalie Hiuyan Chung, and Raquel Coelho. 2021. ‘How Feeling Supports Students’ Interpretive Discussions About Literature’. Journal of Literacy Research 53 (4): 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211052249.
Liebling, Alison, Katherine Auty, Judith Gardom, and Elinor Lieber. 2022. ‘An Evaluation of the Experience and Meaning of Shared Reading in Psychologically Informed Planned Environments in Prisons’. Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63469f72d3bf7f618b1cb7b6/evaluation-of-shared-reading-in-pipes.pdf.
‘Life, the Universe and Stories (Australia)’. n.d. Life, the Universe.. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://www.lifetheuniverseandstories.org.au/about.
Lingwood, Jamie, Josie Billington, and Caroline Rowland. 2020. ‘Evaluating the Effectiveness of a ‘Real-World’ Shared Reading Intervention for Preschool Children and Their Families: A Randomised Controlled Trial’. Journal of Research in Reading 43 (3): 249–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12301.
Longden, Eleanor, Philip Davis, Josie Billington, Sofia Lampropoulou, Grace Farrington, Fiona Magee, Erin Walsh, and Rhiannon Corcoran. 2015. ‘Shared Reading: Assessing the Intrinsic Value of a Literature-Based Health Intervention’. Medical Humanities 41 (2): 113–20. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2015-010704.
Longden, Eleanor, Philip Davis, Janine Carroll, Josie Billington, and Peter Kinderman. 2016. ‘An Evaluation of Shared Reading Groups for Adults Living with Dementia: Preliminary Findings’. Journal of Public Mental Health 15 (2): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-06-2015-0023.
‘Miteinander lesen – Shared Reading (Switzerland)’. n.d. PBZ.ch. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://www.pbz.ch/miteinander-lesen-shared-reading/.
Miyamoto, Ai, Kou Murayama, and Clemens M. Lechner. 2020. ‘The Developmental Trajectory of Intrinsic Reading Motivation: Measurement Invariance, Group Variations, and Implications for Reading Proficiency’. Contemporary Educational Psychology 63 (October):101921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101921.
OECD. 2023. PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en.
Ohlsson, Anders, Mary Ingemansson, Torbjörn Forslid, Henrik Grelz, Anna W. Gustafsson, Kajsa Järvholm, and Marcelo Rivano Fischer. 2018. ‘Book Talks among People with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain. Literary Meaning Making in a Shared Reading Group’. Working Papers in Medical Humanities 4 (1): 1–22.
Orrell, Martin, Tom Dening, Nusrat Husain, Sally Rimkeit, Gillian Claridge, and Dalice Sim. 2019. ‘Reading for Dementia’. In Reading and Mental Health, edited by Josie Billington, 395–418. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21762-4_19.
Pihl, Marie-Elisabeth Lei, Mette Marie Kristensen, Anna Paldam Folker, and Peter Simonsen. 2024. ‘Approaching Literary Connectivity: Early Reflections on a Shared Reading Intervention in the Light of Postcritical Thought’. Orbis Litterarum 79 (2): 145–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/oli.12380.
Retelsdorf, Jan, Olaf Köller, and Jens Möller. 2011. ‘On the Effects of Motivation on Reading Performance Growth in Secondary School’. Learning and Instruction 21 (4): 550–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.11.001.
Robinson, Jude, Josie Billington, Ellie Gray, and Melissa Chapple. 2019. ‘Qualitative Methodologies I: Using Established Qualitative Methods in Research on Reading and Health’. In , 155–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21762-4_9.
Roemhild, Juliane, and Melinda Turner. 2023. ‘Reading in Uncertain Times : Shared Reading for Eudaimonic Wellbeing’. M/C Journal 26 (4). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2983.
Rooijackers, Petrus Johannes Henricus. 2023. ‘Oog voor diep begrip: Onderzoek naar het tekstbegrip van vwo-leerlingen’. Dissertation. Cito. 17 February 2023. https://doi.org/10.33540/1643.
Rosenblatt, Louise M. 1982. ‘The Literary Transaction: Evocation and Response’. Theory Into Practice 21 (4): 268–77.
‘Samen Lezen | Bond zonder Naam (Belgium)’. n.d. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://www.bzn.be/nl/activiteiten/1235/samen-lezen.
‘Shared Reading | Sharing Stories (Switzerland)’. n.d. Sharing Stories. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://www.sharing-stories.org.
‘Shared Reading - Delad läsning (Sweden)’. n.d. Studieförbundet Vuxenskolan. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://www.sv.se/avdelningar/sv-jonkopings-lan/shared-reading.
‘Shared Reading (Norway)’. n.d. Litteratur for alle. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://www.litteraturforalle.no/shared-reading.
‘Shared Reading (Germany)’. n.d. Shared Reading. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://shared-reading.org.
Skjerdingstad, Kjell Ivar, and Thor Magnus Tangerås. 2019. ‘Shared Reading as an Affordance-Nest for Developing Kinesic Engagement with Poetry: A Case Study’. Edited by Anezka Kuzmicova. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6 (1): 1688631. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1688631.
Steenberg, Mette. 2016. ‘Literary Reading as a Social Technology. An Exploratory Study on Shared Reading Groups’. In Plotting the Reading Experience : Theory/Practice/Politics, edited by Paulette Rothbauer, Kjell Ivar Skjerdingstad, Lynne McKechnie, and Knut Oterholm, 183–98. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrd Laurier Press. https://web-p-ebscohost-com.utrechtuniversity.idm.oclc.org/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzE0MzM0ODNfX0FO0?sid=0db0701b-f326-44fa-b6db-4026c07447c2@redis&vid=0&format=EB&lpid=lp_183&rid=0.
Steenberg, Mette, Charlotte Christiansen, Anne Line Dalsgård, Anne Maria Stagis, Liv Moeslund Ahlgren, Tine Lykkegaard Nielsen, and Nicolai Ladegaard. 2021. ‘Facilitating Reading Engagement in Shared Reading’. Poetics Today 42 (2): 229–51. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-8883234.
Swinnen, Aagje. 2023. ‘Poetry and Dementia: Imagining and Shaping More Just Futures’. In A Poetic Language of Ageing, edited by Olga V. Lehmann and Oddgeir Synnes, 27–42. Bloomsbury Studies in the Humanities, Ageing and Later Life. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350256835.ch-002.
Tangerås, Thor Magnus. 2022. ‘Moments of Meeting: A Case Study of Shared Reading of Poetry in a Care Home’. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.965122.
‘The Reader’. n.d. The Reader. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://www.thereader.org.uk/.
‘The Reading Revolution (New Zealand)’. n.d. The Reading Revolution. Accessed 14 October 2024. https://thereadingrevolution.org/.
Troscianko, Emily T. 2018. ‘Fiction-Reading for Good or Ill: Eating Disorders, Interpretation and the Case for Creative Bibliotherapy Research’. Medical Humanities 44 (3): 201–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2017-011375.
Watkins, Megan, Kathryn Naylor, and Rhiannon Corcoran. 2022. ‘Beyond the Sentence: Shared Reading within a High Secure Hospital’. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (November). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015498.
Wolf, Maryanne. 2018. Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World. Harper New York.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Agnes Andeweg, Susanna Linden, Laurie Bastemeijer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
