Geoscience Canada

Vol. 52 No. 3-4 (2025)
Articles

Geomechanical Limitations on Geological Carbon Sequestration in the Cambrian Strata of Southwestern Ontario

Requires Subscription or Fee PDF (CAD 30)
  • Maurice B. Dusseault,
  • Ian M. Colquhoun,
  • Richard E. Jackson,
  • Ali Yaghoubi
Maurice B. Dusseault
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1
Ian M. Colquhoun
Geological Consultant (2289745 Ontario Ltd.), London, Ontario, N6C 1Y1
Richard E. Jackson
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1
Ali Yaghoubi
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12789/geocanj.2025.52.224

Published 2025-12-19

Keywords

  • Aquifer pressurization,
  • Cambrian-Basement faulting,
  • Carbon storage inefficiency,
  • Microseismicity

How to Cite

Dusseault, M. B., Colquhoun, I. M., Jackson, R. E., & Yaghoubi, A. (2025). Geomechanical Limitations on Geological Carbon Sequestration in the Cambrian Strata of Southwestern Ontario. Geoscience Canada, 52(3-4), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.12789/geocanj.2025.52.224
Copyright Notice

Abstract

Geological Carbon Sequestration (GCS) is viable within the Cambrian sandstone reservoir of southwestern Ontario but GCS will likely be limited in sequestration capacity and CO2 injectivity. Capacity and injectivity limitations will arise during CO2 injection because of the fluid-pressure responses induced within the Cambrian reservoir and the subsequent geomechanical-hydrogeological responses in the Precambrian basement. Any coupling between a pressurized reservoir overlying a critically stressed Precambrian basement can be expected to cause local microseismicity. In this context, the challenge is to optimize CO2 injection while minimizing microseismic responses.
The principal risks and responses to the development of the Cambrian sandstone that must be resolved beforehand are (i) the robust estimation of accessible pore space for the injected super-critical CO2; (ii) the limitation of the potential for fracturing or shear damage to the caprock that might allow leakage; (iii) the induced failure of seals in active, suspended or legacy oil and gas wells penetrating the reservoir allowing upward brine or CO2 migration; (iv) the buoyant transmission of CO2 along permeable or unclamped faults penetrating the reservoir; and, (v) any microseismicity induced by pressure increases penetrating critically-stressed basement rocks. Notwithstanding these risks, we believe the Cambrian sandstone is a viable CO2 reservoir for at least 10 megatonnes of CO2 sequestration annually.
The Ontario Government’s 2018 goal of 30% CO2 emissions reduction by 2030 must partly occur though industrial sequestration of CO2 within the Cambrian reservoir. However, to provide information critical for regulatory management of GCS, research is needed immediately to pave the way for CO2 injection operations if they are to have any role in industrial decarbonization. This article summarizes our weak understanding of these critical issues and proposes the development of a research borehole to provide much of the necessary information for regulatory management of CO2 injection. It will also aid the design and operation of CO2 injection hubs along the north shore of Lake Erie. In short, a site similar to the Aquistore site is needed for development of the Cambrian GCS reservoir in southwestern Ontario.

Requires Subscription or Fee PDF (CAD 30)

References

  1. Alghannam, M., and Juanes, R., 2020, Understanding rate effects in injection-induced earthquakes: Nature Communications, v. 11, 3053, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16860-y.
  2. Armstrong, D.K., 1992, Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentation: tectonic influences on a "stable" craton, in Thurston, P.C., Williams, H.R., Sutcliffe, R.H., and Stott, G.M., eds., Geology of Ontario: Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 4, Part 2, p. 1314–1324.
  3. Armstrong, D.K., and Carter, T.R., 2010, The subsurface Paleozoic stratigraphy of southern Ontario: Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 7, 301 p.
  4. Auditor General of Ontario, 2025, Report on progress to reduce greenhouse gas emissions: Ontario Government, Special Report 2025, 71 p., https://www.auditor.on.ca/en/content/specialreports/specialaudits/en2025/AR-PA_PtoRGGE_en25.html.
  5. Bailey Geological Services Ltd., and Cochrane, R.O., 1984, Evaluation of the conventional and potential oil and gas reserves of the Cambrian of Ontario: Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5499, 72 p.
  6. Bailey, S., 2003, A geological model for the Innerkip gas pool, Oxford County, Blandford/Blenheim Townships, Ontario: Ontario Petroleum Institute Annual Meeting, Technical Paper 11.
  7. Boyce, J.I., and Morris, W.A., 2002, Basement-controlled faulting of Paleozoic strata in southern Ontario, Canada: new evidence from geophysical lineament mapping: Tectonophysics, v. 353, p. 151–171, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00280-9.
  8. Bradley, D.C., 1997, The Northern Appalachians, in Van der Pluijm, B.A., and Marshak, S., eds., Earth Structure: An Introduction to Structural Geology and Tectonics: McGraw-Hill, p. 445–450.
  9. Brudzinski, M.R., and Kozłowska, M., 2019, Seismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing and wastewater disposal in the Appalachian Basin, USA: A review: Acta Geophysica, v. 67, p. 351–364, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00249-7.
  10. Bump, A.P., and Hovorka, S.D., 2024, Pressure space: The key subsurface commodity for CCS: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 136, 104174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104174.
  11. Buscheck, T.A., Sun, Y., Chen, M., Hao, Y., Wolery, T.J., Bourcier, W.L., Court, B., Celia, M.A., Friedmann, S.J., and Aines, R.D., 2012, Active CO2 reservoir management for carbon storage: Analysis of operational strategies to relieve pressure buildup and improve injectivity: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 6, p. 230–245, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.007.
  12. Cao, M., Guglielmi, Y., Rutqvist, J., Cihan, A., Glubokovskikh, S., Jordan, P., Reagan, M., and Birkholzer, J., 2025, Hydromechanical modeling of fault rupture in geologic CO2 sequestration: A comparison of two failure criteria: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 52, e2025GL115250, https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL115250.
  13. Carter, T., Gunter, W., Lazorek, M., and Craig, R., 2007, Geological sequestration of carbon dioxide: a technology review and analysis of opportunities in Ontario: Climate Change Research Report - Ontario Forest Research Institute, (CCRR-07). Available from terry.carter@cartergeologic.com.
  14. Chalaturnyk, R., 2021, Part I: Field-based observations for CO2 geological storage from 6 years of CO2 injection at Aquistore: Webinar by the Reservoir Geomechanics Research Group, University of Alberta, https://cmcghg.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/RChalaturnyk-Webinar-April14-2021.pdf.
  15. City News Toronto, 2007, Nanticoke facility worst single source of greenhouse gases, study finds: Rogers Broadcasting Ltd. Accessed 2025-03-24 from http://www.citytv.com/toronto/citynews/news/local/article/12313--nanticoke-facility-worst-single-source-of-greenhouse-gases-study-finds.
  16. Colquhoun, I., 2012, Middle Ordovician Trenton-Black River Group carbonate play in southwestern Ontario: Ontario Oil & Gas 2012, p. 56–62.
  17. Colquhoun, I., 2024, Middle Ordovician and Cambrian-aged sediments, southwestern Ontario: Core Workshop, published by the Oil, Gas, Salt Resources Library, London, Ontario.
  18. Colquhoun, I.M., 1991, Paragenetic history of the Ordovician Trenton Group carbonates, southwestern Ontario: Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Brock University, Ontario, 250 p.
  19. Colquhoun, I., and Johnston, H.P., 2004, A comprehensive evaluation of the Dover 7-5-VE Trenton-Black River Hydrothermal Dolomite (HTD) Reservoir, in Ontario-New York Oil and Gas Conference, OPI Forty-third Annual Conference, Niagara Falls, Ontario. November 8–10, 2004, Technical Paper Number 16, 15 p.
  20. Davies, G.R., and Smith Jr., L.B., 2006, Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies: An overview: AAPG Bulletin, v. 90, p. 1641–1690, https://doi.org/10.1306/05220605164.
  21. Dooley, T., and McClay, K., 1997, Analog modeling of pull-apart basins: AAPG Bulletin, v. 81, p. 1804–1826.
  22. Dorland, M., Colquhoun, I., Carter, T.R., Phillips, A., Fortner, L., Clark, J., and Hamilton, D., 2016, Ontario Oil and Gas: 2. Cambrian and Ordovician conventional plays: Reservoir, v. 43, p. 18–25. Available at: https://www.cspg.org/common/Uploaded%20files/pdfs/documents/publications/reservoir/2016/02-October2016.pdf.
  23. Duhan, J., Dusseault, M.B., and Jackson, R.E., 2017, Potential of deep brine disposal in southwestern Ontario: CANMET Energy, Natural Resources Canada, Technical Report prepared by the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.
  24. Dunham, K.W., Meyers, P.A., and Rullkötter, J., 1988, Biomarker comparisons of Michigan Basin oils, in Moldowan, J.M., and Yen, T.F., eds., Geochemical Biomarkers, 1st edition, Routledge, p. 181–202.
  25. Dusseault, M.B., Bruno, M.S., and Barrera, J., 2001, Casing shear: Causes, cases, cures: SPE Drilling & Completion, v. 16, p. 98–107, https://doi.org/10.2118/72060-PA.
  26. Easton, R.M., and Carter, T.R., 1995, Geology of the Precambrian basement beneath the Paleozoic of southwestern Ontario, in Ojakangas, R.W., Dickas, A.B., and Green, J.C., eds., Basement Tectonics 10. Proceedings of the International Conference on Basement Tectonics, v. 4, Spinger Dordrecht, p. 221–264, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0831-9_26.
  27. ECCC. Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2025, Canadian environmental sustainability indicators: Greenhouse gas emissions: Government of Canada. Available at: www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-indicators/greenhouse-gas-emissions.htm.
  28. Firoozabadi, A., and Myint, P.C., 2010, Prospects for subsurface CO2 sequestration: American Institute of Chemical Engineering Journal, v. 56, p. 1398–1405, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.12287.
  29. Geofirma Engineering, 2023, Geological CO2 storage in southwestern Ontario: A road map for CCUS deployment in Ontario: Prepared for CANMET Energy, NRCan, Ottawa. Available from: rjackson@geofirma.com.
  30. Geofirma Engineering, 2024, Potential geological CO2 storage reservoirs in central and eastern Canada: Prepared for Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, Québec. Available from: rjackson@geofirma.com.
  31. Goertz-Allmann, B., and 14 others, 2024, Optimized microseismic event detection and source analysis at the Quest CCS Site, Alberta, Canada: 17th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-17, 20–24 October 2024, Calgary, Alberta.
  32. Hart, B.S., 2024a, Carbon-sequestration geosystems: A new paradigm for understanding geologic storage of CO2, with application to southwest Ontario, Canada: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 132, 104071, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104071.
  33. Hart, B.S., 2024b, The why, what, who, when, and where of carbon capture and storage in southern Ontario: Geoscience Canada, v. 51, p. 131–146, https://doi.org/10.12789/geocanj.2024.51.212.
  34. Hart, B.S., Sagan, J.A., and Ogiesoba, O.C., 2009, Lessons learned from 3-D seismic attribute studies of hydrothermal dolomite reservoirs: CSEG Recorder, v. 34(5), p.18–24.
  35. Haszeldine, S., and Ghaleigh, N.S., 2018, Geological factors for legislation, in Havercroft, I., Macrory, R., and Stewart, R., eds., Carbon Capture and Storage: Emerging Legal and Regulatory Issues, 2nd Edition: Hart Publishing Plc., Oxford, UK.
  36. Holtkamp, S.G., Brudzinski, M.R., and Currie, B.S., 2015, Regional detection and monitoring of injection-induced seismicity: Application to the 2010–2012 Youngstown, Ohio, seismic sequence: AAPG Bulletin, v. 99, p. 1671–1688, https://doi.org/10.1306/03311513194.
  37. Horvath, E., Molgat, M., and Davies, L., 2004, An example of a Trenton-Black River Reservoir: A case study of the Rochester Pools, Ontario, in Ontario-New York Oil and Gas Conference, OPI Forty-third Annual Conference, Niagara Falls, Ontario. November 8–10, 2004, Technical Paper, Number 14, 9 p.
  38. Intera Engineering Ltd., 2011, Descriptive geosphere site model: Prepared for the Nuclear Waste Management Organization, Toronto, Ontario, NWMO DGR-TR-2011-24.
  39. Jackson, R.E., Madronich, L., and Walsh, R., 2024, The hydrogeological challenge of geological CO2 storage in the Ontario Cambrian Fm.: presented at EPEX 2024, London, Ontario, Ontario Petroleum Institute.
  40. Jackson, S.S., 2017, A Numerical Study on the Viscous Fingering Instability of Immiscible Displacement in Hele-Shaw Cell: Unpublished PhD thesis, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK, 245 p.
  41. Keller, E.A., and Pinter, N., 1996, Active tectonics: Earthquakes, Uplift, and Landscape, Second Edition: Pearson Inc., 384 p.
  42. Kim, W-Y., 2013, Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection into a deep well in Youngstown, Ohio: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, v. 118, p. 3506–3518, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50247.
  43. Lake, L.W., 1989, Enhanced Oil Recovery: Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 550 p.
  44. Lam, T., and Usher, S., 2011, Regional geomechanics - southern Ontario: Nuclear Waste Management Organization, Toronto, Ontario, NWMO DGR-TR-2011-13.
  45. Leonenko, Y., and Keith, D.W., 2008, Reservoir engineering to accelerate the dissolution of CO2 stored in aquifers: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 42, p. 2742–2747, https://doi.org/10.1021/es071578c.
  46. Luu, K., Schoenball, M., Oldenburg, C.M., and Rutqvist, J., 2022, Coupled hydromechanical modeling of induced seismicity from CO2 injection in the Illinois Basin: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, v. 127, e2021JB023496, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023496.
  47. Malekzadeh, F.A., and Dusseault, M.B., 2013, A solution for the transition zone isosats in two-phase primary drainage in the presence of gravity: Computational Geosciences, v. 17, p. 757–771, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-013-9354-2.
  48. Mereu, R., Brunet, J., Morrissey, K., Price, B., and Yapp, A., 1986, A study of the microearthquakes of the Gobles oil field area of southwestern Ontario: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 76, p. 1215–1223.
  49. Morris, A.P., Ferrill, D.A., Walter, G.R., Price, A.M., Smart, K.J., Skoumal, R.J., Brudzinski, M.R., and Currie, B.S., 2017, Lessons learned from the Youngstown, Ohio induced earthquake sequence from January 2011 to January 2012: Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, v. 9, p. 783–796, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.03.016.
  50. Ogiesoba, O.C., and Hart, B.S., 2009, Fault imaging in hydrothermal dolomite reservoirs: A case study: Geophysics, v. 74, p. B71–B82, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3106722.
  51. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, 2012, Preliminary report on the Northstar 1 Class II injection well and the seismic events in the Youngstown, Ohio area: ODNR Report, Columbus, Ohio, 24 p. Available at: https://media.cleveland.com/business_impact/other/UICReport.pdf.
  52. Oldenburg, C.M., Mukhopadhyay, S., and Cihan, A., 2016, On the use of Darcy's law and invasion‐percolation approaches for modeling large‐scale geologic carbon sequestration: Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, v. 6, p. 19–33, https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1564.
  53. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, 2018, Preserving and protecting our environment for future generations: A made-in-Ontario environment plan: Government of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, 54 p. Available at: https://ero.ontario.ca/public/2018-11/EnvironmentPlan.pdf.
  54. Phillips, A.R., Brunton, F.R., and Yeung, K.H., 2023, Summary of field work and other activities, 2023: Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6405, p. 26-1–26-7. Available at: https://www.geologyontario.mines.gov.on.ca/publication/OFR6405.
  55. Preuss, K., and Spycher, N., 2007, ECO2N-A fluid property module for the TOUGH2 code for studies of CO2 storage in saline aquifers: Energy Conversion and Management, v. 48, p. 1761–1767, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.01.016.
  56. Raven, K.G., Novakowski, K.S., Yager, R.M., and Heystee, R.J., 1992, Supernormal fluid pressures in sedimentary rocks of southern Ontario – western New York State: Canadian Geotechnical Journal, v. 29, p. 80–93, https://doi.org/10.1139/t92-009.
  57. Ringrose, P., 2020, How to Store CO2 Underground: Insights from Early-mover CCS Projects: Springer Briefs in Earth Sciences Series, Springer Nature, Switzerland, 129 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33113-9.
  58. Samaroo, M., McClure, M., Fowler, G., Chalaturnyk, R., Dusseault, M.B., and Hawkes, C., 2024, Injection temperature impacts on reservoir response during CO2 storage: Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, v. 29, SPE-219461-PA, https://doi.org/10.2118/219461-PA.
  59. Senior, B., Bradshaw, J., Chikkatur, A., and Wright, M., 2011, Planning saline reservoir storage developments — The importance of getting started early: Energy Procedia, v. 4, p. 4575–4582, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.416.
  60. Shafeen, A., Croiset, E., Douglas, P.L., and Chatzis, I., 2004, CO2 sequestration in Ontario, Canada. Part I: storage evaluation of potential reservoirs: Energy Conversion and Management, v. 45, p. 2645–2659, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.12.003.
  61. Shell Canada Ltd., 2024, Quest carbon capture and storage project: 2023 Annual Status Report: Government of Alberta, 60 p. + Appendices. Available at: https://open.alberta.ca/publications/quest-carbon-capture-and-storage-project-annual-report-2023#summary.
  62. Silva, J.A., Khosravi, M., Yoon, H., Fehler, M., Frailey, S., and Juanes, R., 2024, Mechanisms for microseismicity occurrence due to CO2 injection at Decatur, Illinois: A coupled multiphase flow and geomechanics perspective: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 114, p. 2424–2445, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230160.
  63. Skoumal, R.J., Brudzinski, M.R., Currie, B.S., and Levy, J., 2014, Optimizing multi-station earthquake template matching through re-examination of the Youngstown, Ohio, sequence: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 405, p. 274–280, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.08.033.
  64. Skoumal, R.J., Brudzinski, M.R., and Currie, B.S., 2015a, Earthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing in Poland Township, Ohio: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 105, p. 189–197, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140168.
  65. Skoumal, R.J., Brudzinski, M.R., and Currie, B.S., 2015b, Microseismicity induced by deep wastewater injection in southern Trumbull County, Ohio: Seismological Research Letters, v. 86, p. 1326–1334, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150055.
  66. Stork, A.L., Nixon, C.G., Hawkes, C.D., Birnie, C., White, D.J., Schmitt, D.R., and Roberts, B., 2018, Is CO2 injection at Aquistore aseismic? A combined seismological and geomechanical study of early injection operations: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 75, p. 107–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.05.016.
  67. Valluri, M., Mishra, S., and Ravi Ganesh, P., 2021, Injectivity index: a powerful tool for characterizing CO2 storage reservoirs—a technical note: Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, v. 11, p. 251–265, https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2046.
  68. Walsh, R., Madronich, L., and Jackson, R.E., 2025, Geological CO2 storage in Ontario: Status update: Presentation at Carbon Capture Canada 2025, Calgary, Alberta, June 2–3, Geofirma Engineering, Ottawa.
  69. Woods, A.W., 2015, Flow in Porous Rocks: Energy and Environmental Applications: Cambridge University Press, UK, 289 p., https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107588677.
  70. Yaghoubi, A., Schultz, R., Hickson, C., Wigston, A., and Dusseault, M.B., 2024, Induced seismicity traffic light protocol at the Alberta No.1 geothermal project site: Geothermics, v. 117, 102860., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2023.102860.
  71. Zoback, M.D., and Gorelick, S.M., 2012, Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 109, p. 10164–10168, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202473109.