Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 28 No. 3 (2025): Second language pronunciation: Current issues and developments

Perceived nativelikeness in adult learners of Quebec French: A multiple-case study of self-regulated strategies

DOI
https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2025.35873
Submitted
December 9, 2025
Published
2025-12-15

Abstract

Language learning in adulthood is often believed to be influenced by maturational constraints. However, recent research suggests that social and psychological factors can shape exceptional phonological outcomes. This multiple-case study explored the experiences of five adult learners who can (momentarily) pass for native speakers of Quebec French. Participants provided retrospective diaries and participated in semi-directed interviews to discuss their communicative goals, challenges, and strategies. The data were analysed to assess the role of conscious phonological development and self-regulated learning strategies in developing passing abilities. The results revealed that pronunciation was not a central theme. One participant used strategies to sound local for linguistic capital, while another aimed for intelligibility over native-like pronunciation. The remaining three participants appeared to achieve exceptional phonological outcomes more unconsciously. These findings highlight the complex interplay of linguistic, social, and psychological factors in adult Lx learners’ development, offering new insights into passing.

References

  1. Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning. 59(2), 249-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x
  2. Ballard, L., & Winke, P. (2017). Students’ attitudes towards English teachers’ accents: The interplay of accent familiarity, comprehensibility, intelligibility, perceived native speaker status, and acceptability as a teacher. In T. Isaacs, & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives (Vol. 107, pp. 121–140). Multilingual Matters & Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096855-009
  3. Bartning, I., Forsberg, F., & Hancock, V. (2009). Resources and obstacles in very advanced L2 French: Formulaic language, information structure and morphosyntax. EUROSLA Yearbook, 9(1), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.9.10bar
  4. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr195oa
  5. Bown, J., Dewey, D.P., & Belnap, R.K. (2015). Students’ interactions during study abroad in Jordan. In R. Mitchell, N. Tracy-Ventura, & K. McManus (Eds.). Social interaction, identity and language learning during residence abroad (pp. 199-222), EUROSLA monographs.
  6. Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In E. Alcón Soler, & M. P. Safont Jordà (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (p. 41-57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5639-0_3
  7. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
  8. Cutler, C. (2014). Accentedness, ‘’passing’’ and crossing. In M.J. Levis, & A. Moyer (Eds.), Social dynamics in second language accent (pp.145-168). DeGruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511762.145
  9. Deveau, C. (2021). Récits rétrospectifs d’usagers experts du français québécois langue seconde : regards sur le développement de la compétence communicative et les stratégies autorégulées [Master dissertation, Université Laval]. https://corpus.ulaval.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/861213a7-3527-4e89-b380-5be33e352bcf/content
  10. Dewaele, J.-M. (2004). Vous or tu? Native and non-native speakers of French on a sociolinguistic tightrope. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42(4), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2004.42.4.383
  11. Erman, B., Denke, A., Fant, L., & Forsberg Lundell, F. (2015). Nativelike expression in the speech of long-residency L2 users: A study of multiword structures in L2 English, French and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 160-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12061
  12. French, L., Beaulieu, S., & Huot, D. (2017). Regard sur le développement de la compétence de communication à l’oral : récit rétrospectif d’un apprenant de français langue seconde. Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 20(2), i-xxiii. https://doi.org/10.7202/1042672ar
  13. Forsberg Lundell, F. (2013). ¿Qué significa ‘pasar por nativo’? Un estudio exploratorio sobre la actuación oral de usuarios muy avanzados de español y francés como segundas lenguas. Studia Neophilologica, 85(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2013.771492
  14. Forsberg Lundell, F., Arvidsson, K., & Jemstedt, A. (2022). What factors predict perceived nativelikeness in long-term L2 users. Second Language Research, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658322109139
  15. Forsberg Lundell, F., & Bartning, I. (Eds.). (2015). Cultural migrants and optimal language acquisition. Multilingual Matters & Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.26931948
  16. Forsberg Lundell, F., & Erman, B. (2012). High-level requests: A study of long residency L2 users of English and French and native speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(6-7), 756-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.010
  17. Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Multilingual Matters.
  18. Gao, X. (2022) Narrative methods. In S. Li, P. Hiver & M. Papi (Eds.) The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp.413-426). Routledge.
  19. Gautier, R., & Chevrot, J.P. (2015). Social networks and acquisition of sociolinguistic variation in a study abroad context: A preliminary study. In R. Mitchell, N. Tracy-Ventura, & K. McManus (Eds.). Social interaction, identity and language learning during residence abroad (pp. 169-184), EUROSLA monographs.
  20. Gnevsheva, K. (2017). Within-speaker variation in passing for a native speaker. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(2), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006915616197
  21. Granena, G., & Long, M.H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461497
  22. Harrison, G. (2012). ‘’Oh, you’ve got such a strong accent’’: Language identity intersecting with professional identity in the human services in Australia. International Migration. 51(5), 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12005
  23. Huang, J. (2005). A diary study of difficulties and constraints in EFL learning. System, 33(4), 609-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.04.001
  24. Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Re-examining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(1), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012596
  25. Jakobsen, N.D. (2008). Identity [iz] a [djifik!lt] question : A variationist analysis of the relationship between L1 features and ethnic identity in the speech of Russian learners of English. eVox: Georgetown Working Papers in Language, Discourse, and Society, 2.
  26. Lee, A. (2022). Revisiting the role of age in second language speech acquisition. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 8(2), 248-278. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.21026.lee
  27. Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. Wiley.
  28. Le Thi, D., Dörnyei, Z., & Pellicer-Sanchez, A. (2020). Increasing the effectiveness of teaching L2 formulaic sequences through motivational strategies and mental imagery: A classroom experiment. Language Teaching research, 26(6), 1202-1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820913125
  29. Li, S., Hiver, P., & Papi, M. (2022). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546
  30. Loewen, S. (2020). Introduction to instructed second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616797
  31. Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 251-285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009165
  32. Long, M.H. (2003) Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In C.J. Doughty, & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 487–535). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch16
  33. Ma, R., & Oxford, R.L. (2014). A diary study focusing on listening and speaking: The evolving interaction of learning styles and learning strategies in a motivated, advanced ESL learner. System, 43, 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.010
  34. Marx, N. (2002). Never quite a ‘native speaker’: Accent and identity in the L2- and the L1. La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 59(2), 264-281. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.2.264
  35. Mercer S. (2019). Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 643-660). Springer International Handbooks of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_40
  36. Mougeon, F., & Rehner, K. (2015). Engagement portraits and (socio)linguistic performance: A transversal and longitudinal study of advanced L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(3), 425-456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000369
  37. Moyer, A. (2011). An investigation of experience in L2 phonology: Does quality matter more than quantity? La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 67(2), 191-216. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.67.2.191
  38. Moyer, A. (2014a). Exceptional outcomes in L2 phonology: The critical factors of learner engagement and self-regulation. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 418-440. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1093/applin/amu012
  39. Moyer, A. (2014b). The social nature of L2 pronunciation. In M.J. Levis, & A. Moyer (Eds.), Social dynamics in second language accent (pp. 11-29). DeGruyter Mouton.
  40. Muñoz, C. (2019). A new look at age: Young and old L2 learners. In J. W. Schwieter, & A. Benati (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 251-265). Cambridge University Press.
  41. Muramatsu, C. (2018). Portraits of language learners: An L2 learner agency perspective. Multilingual Matters.
  42. Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Pearson Education Limited
  43. Pattinson, J. (2010). ‘Passing unnoticed in a French crowd’: The passing performances of British SOE agents in occupied France. National Identities, 12(3), 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2010.500469
  44. Piller, I. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(2), 179-206.
  45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00184
  46. Plonsky, L. (2023). Sampling and generalizability in Lx research: A second-order synthesis. Languages, 8(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010075
  47. Rao, Z., & Liu, F. (2011). Effect of academic major on students’ use of language learning strategies: A diary study in a Chinese context. Language Learning Journal, 39(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571731003653565
  48. Sardegna, V.G., Lee, J., & Kusey, C. (2018). Self-efficacy, attitudes, and choice of strategies for English pronunciation learning. Language Learning, 68(1), 83-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12263
  49. Schilt, K., & Westbrook, L. (2009). Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: «Gender normal», Transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender and Society, 23(4), 440-464. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20676798
  50. Schmid, M.S., Gilbers, S., & Nota, A. (2014). Ultimate attainment in late second language acquisition: Phonetic and grammatical challenges in advances Dutch-English bilingualism. Second Language Research, 30(2), 129-157. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44280132
  51. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
  52. Spezzini, S., Franks, S., & Carter, D. (2018). Accent reduction vs intelligibility. In J.I. Liontas, & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.). The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0707
  53. Szyszka, M. (2015). Good English pronunciation users and their pronunciation, Research in Language, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0017
  54. Yan, W. (2020). Unpacking the relationship between formulaic sequences and speech fluency on elicited imitation tasks: Proficiency level, sentence length, and fluency dimensions. TESOL Quarterly, 54(2), 460-487. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.556
  55. Zhong, Q.M. (2019). Learner beliefs. In J. W. Schwieter, & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 220-232). Cambridge University Press.