Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 27 No. 3 (2024)

A youth perspective on the challenges related to fostering linguistic security in the classroom: New insights from the English-dominant context of British Columbia

DOI
https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2024.33561
Submitted
July 20, 2023
Published
2025-05-30

Abstract

This study aims to identify factors contributing to linguistic insecurity and provides suggestions to support teachers in fostering linguistic security in their classrooms. The findings are based on data from interviews with 21 high school teachers from across the province of British Columbia (Canada) and a focus group with eight members of the Linguistic Security Committee. A thematic analysis of the data led to the identification of five sets of teacher beliefs associated with challenges about the fostering of linguistic security in their classrooms. For each of these challenges, the Linguistic Security Committee made recommendations, and these may prove helpful to teachers in French-speaking minority contexts across Canada. Three main conclusions are drawn from this study: attention to teacher beliefs should be a focus of educational research, teacher preparation grounded in a sociolinguistic understanding of linguistic variation is necessary, and linguistic security should be a priority.

References

  1. Alim, H. S. (2005). Critical language awareness in the United States: Revisiting issues and revising pedagogies in a resegregated society. Educational Researcher, 34(7), 24–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699797
  2. Bergeron, C., Blanchet, P. et Lebon-Eyquem, M. (2022). Étude exploratoire de l’insécurité linguistique et de la glottophobie chez des étudiants universitaires de l’Ontario. Minorités linguistiques et société, 19. 3-25. https://doi.org/10.7202/1094396ar
  3. Bouchard, M-E. (2024). Language ideologies and the use of French in an English-dominant context of Canada: New insights into linguistic security. Multilingua, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2023-0109
  4. Boudreau, A. (2021). Dire le silence : insécurité linguistique en Acadie 1867-1970. Prise de Parole.
  5. Boudreau, A. et Dubois, L. (1993). J’parle pas comme les Français de France ben c’est du français pareil : j’ai ma own p’tite langue. In M. Francard (Ed.), L’insécurité linguistique dans les communautés francophones périphériques (p. 147-168). Cahiers de l’Institut linguistique de Louvain.
  6. Boudreau, A. et Dubois, L. (2008). Représentations, sécurité/insécurité linguistique et éducation en milieu minoritaire. Dans P. Dalley et S. Roy (dir.), Francophonies, minorités et pédagogie (p. 145–175). Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa.
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire : l’économie des échanges linguistiques. Fayard.
  8. Bowie, R. L., & Bond, C. L. (1994). Influencing teachers’ attitudes toward Black English: Are we making a difference? Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487194045002005
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2). 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  10. Breen, M., Hird, B., Milton, M., Oliver, R., & Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: Teachers’ principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 470-501. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.4.470
  11. Bretenier, A. (1999). Sécurité et insécurité linguistique. Approches sociolinguistique et pragmatique d’une situation de contacts de langues : la réunion [Dissertation, Université de La Réunion & Université de Provence]. HAL open science. https://hal.science/tel-01517920
  12. Bucci, W., & Baxter, M. (1984). Problems of linguistic insecurity in multicultural speech contexts. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 433(1), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb14767.x
  13. Calvet, L.-J. (1999). Pour une écologie des langues du monde. Plon.
  14. Canadian Parents for French. (2020, April). Building linguistic security. Be brave, speak French. https://cpf.ca/wp-content/uploads/CPF_2020_LinguisticSecurityBrief_EN_v9_EMAIL-1.pdf
  15. Canut C. (1995). Dynamique et imaginaire linguistiques dans les sociétés à tradition orale [Dissertation, Université Paris 3].
  16. Conseil jeunesse francophone de la Colombie-Britannique (CJFCB). (2023). Comité sécurité linguistique de la C.-B. Repéré le 10 octobre 2024 à https://www.cjfcb.com/programmation/comite-securite-linguistique-de-la-c-b
  17. Desabrais, T. (2013). Les mots pour le dire… L’influence de l’(in)sécurité linguistique sur l’expérience d’étudiantes de milieux francophones minoritaires canadiens inscrites aux études supérieures à l’Université d’Ottawa [Dissertation, Université d’Ottawa]. Thèses uOttawa. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/items/8695a089-7f67-42f9-be04-e02319d6bdb7
  18. Fenstermacher, G. (1979). A philosophical consideration of recent research on teacher effectiveness. Review of research in education, 6, 157–185. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1167245
  19. Ferguson, R. F. (1998). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black–White test scores gap. In C. Jencks, & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black–White test score gap (pp. 273–317). Brookings Institution Press.
  20. Francard, M. (1993). Trop proches pour ne pas être différents. Profils de l’insécurité linguistique dans la Communauté française de Belgique. In M. Francard, G. Geron, & R. Wilmet (Eds.), L’insécurité linguistique dans les communautés francophones périphériques (p. 61-70). Institut de linguistique. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/75299
  21. Gueunier, N., Genouvrier, É. et Khomsi, A. (1978). Les Français devant la norme. Champion.
  22. Heller, M. (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 473-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238.x
  23. Hua, Z. (2017). New orientations to identity in mobility. In S. Canagarajah (Ed.), Routledge handbook of migration and language (pp. 117–132). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754512
  24. Jean-Pierre, J. (2017). Le rêve inachevé d’étudier et de socialiser en français en toute sécurité linguistique : les perspectives d’étudiants franco-ontariens. Canadian Journal of Higher Education / Revue canadienne d'enseignement supérieur, 47(3), 120-135. https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1043241ar
  25. Johnson, K. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as a second language teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 439-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)90024-8
  26. Jones, W. H., Briggs, S. R., & Smith T. G. (1986). Shyness: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629-639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.629
  27. Kagan, D. (1992). Implications of research on teachers’ belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6
  28. Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Center for Applied Linguistics.
  29. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistics patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  30. Labov, W. (2006). The social stratification of English in New York City (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  31. Li, L. (2013). The complexity of language teachers’ beliefs and practice: One EFL teacher’s theories. The Language Learning Journal, 41(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.790132
  32. McLaughlin, M. (2021). L’insécurité linguistique à travers le prisme des questions de classe sociale : le cas de l’Acadie. Dans É. Urbain et L. Arrighi (dirs.), Retour en Acadie : penser les langues et la sociolinguistique à partir des marges : textes en hommage à Annette Boudreau (p. 87-107). Presse de l’Université Laval.
  33. Meyerhoff, M. (2006). Introducing sociolinguistics. Routledge.
  34. Mo, X. (2020). Teaching reading and teacher beliefs: A sociocultural perspective. English language education (vol. 20). Springer.
  35. Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages (OCOL). (2021). Linguistic (in)security at work – Exploratory survey on official languages among federal government employees in Canada. https://www.clo-ocol.gc.ca/en/publications/studies-other-reports/2021/linguistic-insecurity-work-exploratory-survey-official
  36. Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
  37. Park, J. S-Y. (2014). You say ouch and I say aya. Linguistic insecurity in a narrative of transnational work. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 24(2), 241-260. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.24.2.05par
  38. Pavlenko, A., & Blackledge, A. (Eds.). (2004). Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596483
  39. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102–119). Macmillan.
  40. Robillard, S. (2021). Implicit norms and ‘school French’ forms: Linguistic cohesion of second-generation francophones in Victoria, BC [Dissertation, University of Ottawa]. uOttawa Theses. http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-25945
  41. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. Jossey-Bass.
  42. Rosa, J. (2019). Looking like a language, sounding like a race: Raciolinguistic ideologies and the learning of Latinidad. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190634728.001.0001
  43. SNSL (2023). Stratégie nationale pour la sécurité linguistique. Repéré le 10 octobre 2024 à https://snsl.ca/
  44. Statistics Canada. (2019). The French language in British Columbia, 2001to 2016: Facts and figures. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/89-657-x/89-657-x2019017-eng.htm
  45. Traisnel, C., Violette, I. et Gallant, N. (2013). Les minorités francophones canadiennes face à l’immigration : particularismes et représentations de la diversité ethnoculturelle dans les milieux associatifs. Minorités linguistiques et sociétés, 2, 9-28. https://doi.org/10.7202/1014843ar